Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35963491›Full record

Observational studyThe journal of pain2022

Applying the Rapid OPPERA Algorithm to Predict Persistent Pain Outcomes Among a Cohort of Women Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery.

Jenna M Wilson, Carin A Colebaugh, K Mikayla Flowers, Demario Overstreet, Robert R Edwards, William Maixner, Shad B Smith, Kristin L Schreiber

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The journal of pain, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Moving towards the use of artificial intelligence in pain management.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Personalized Medicine in Cancer Pain Management.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jenna M WilsonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: jwilson47@bwh.harvard.edu.
Carin A ColebaughDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
K Mikayla FlowersDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Demario OverstreetDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Robert R EdwardsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
William MaixnerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Shad B SmithDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Kristin L SchreiberDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USDuke University · US

Funding

Personalizing Perioperative Preventive Analgesia: Translational Studies Investigating the Biopsychosocial Underpinnings of Enhanced Pain PropensityR35GM128691 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KRISTIN SCHREIBER · 2018 to 2026
$4.3M
Prediction and Prevention of Persistent Post-Mastectomy PainK23GM110540 · NIGMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SCHREIBER, KRISTIN · 2015 to 2018
$762k
NIGMS NIH HHS K23 GM110540NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Persistent postmastectomy pain after breast surgery is variable in duration and severity across patients, due in part to interindividual variability in pain processing. The Rapid OPPERA Algorithm (ROPA) empirically identified 3 clusters of patients with different risk of chronic pain based on 4 key psychophysical and psychosocial characteristics. We aimed to test this type of group-based clustering within in a perioperative cohort undergoing breast surgery to investigate differences in postsurgical pain outcomes. Women (N = 228) scheduled for breast cancer surgery were prospectively enrolled in a longitudinal observational study. Pressure pain threshold (PPT), anxiety, depression, and somatization were assessed preoperatively. At 2-weeks, 3, 6, and 12-months after surgery, patients reported surgical area pain severity, impact of pain on cognitive/emotional and physical functioning, and pain catastrophizing. The ROPA clustering, which used patients' preoperative anxiety, depression, somatization, and PPT scores, assigned patients to 3 groups: Adaptive (low psychosocial scores, high PPT), Pain Sensitive (moderate psychosocial scores, low PPT), and Global Symptoms (high psychosocial scores, moderate PPT). The Global Symptoms cluster, compared to other clusters, reported significantly worse persistent pain outcomes following surgery. Findings suggest that patient characteristic-based clustering algorithms, like ROPA, may generalize across diverse diagnoses and clinical settings, indicating the importance of "person type" in understanding pain variability. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents the practical translation of a previously developed patient clustering solution, based within a chronic pain cohort, to a perioperative cohort of women undergoing breast cancer surgery. Such preoperative characterization could potentially help clinicians apply personalized interventions based on predictions concerning postsurgical pain.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsChronic PainAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMastectomyPostoperative PainClusteringPainPostsurgicalPsychophysicalPsychosocial

Identifiers

PMID35963491
PMCPMC9729400
OpenAlexW4291398394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.