Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35963432›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2022

Phase-separation antagonists potently inhibit transcription and broadly increase nucleosome density.

Rajyalakshmi Meduri, Linda S Rubio, Suman Mohajan, David S Gross

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rajyalakshmi MeduriDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA.
Linda S RubioDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA.
Suman MohajanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA.
David S GrossDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA. Electronic address: david.gross@lsuhs.edu.
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport · US

Funding

Genome Architecture and Gene Control in Response to StressR01GM138988 · NIGMS · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV HSC SHREVEPORT · PI GROSS, DAVID SAMUEL · 2020 to 2023
$1.2M
Role of Actin in the Chromosomal Conformation & Nuclear Organization of HSP GenesR15GM128065 · NIGMS · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV HSC SHREVEPORT · PI GROSS, DAVID SAMUEL · 2018 to 2019
$523k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM138988NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM128065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomolecular condensates are self-organized membraneless bodies involved in many critical cellular activities, including ribosome biogenesis, protein synthesis, and gene transcription. Aliphatic alcohols are commonly used to study biomolecular condensates, but their effects on transcription are unclear. Here, we explore the impact of the aliphatic dialcohol, 1,6-hexanediol (1,6-HD), on Pol II transcription and nucleosome occupancy in budding yeast. As expected, 1,6-HD, a reagent effective in disrupting biomolecular condensates, strongly suppressed the thermal stress-induced transcription of Heat Shock Factor 1-regulated genes that have previously been shown to physically interact and coalesce into intranuclear condensates. Surprisingly, the isomeric dialcohol, 2,5-HD, typically used as a negative control, abrogated Heat Shock Factor 1-target gene transcription under the same conditions. Each reagent also abolished the transcription of genes that do not detectably coalesce, including Msn2/Msn4-regulated heat-inducible genes and constitutively expressed housekeeping genes. Thus, at elevated temperature (39 °C), HDs potently inhibit the transcription of disparate genes and as demonstrated by chromatin immunoprecipitation do so by abolishing occupancy of RNA polymerase in chromatin. Concurrently, histone H3 density increased at least twofold within all gene coding and regulatory regions examined, including quiescent euchromatic loci, silent heterochromatic loci, and Pol III-transcribed loci. Our results offer a caveat for the use of HDs in studying the role of condensates in transcriptional control and provide evidence that exposure to these reagents elicits a widespread increase in nucleosome density and a concomitant loss of both Pol II and Pol III transcription.

Indexed as

ChromatinGlycolsNucleosomesRNA Polymerase IITranscription, GeneticChromatin ImmunoprecipitationChromatinGlycolshexamethylene glycolNucleosomesRNA Polymerase IIbudding yeastchromatinHeat Shock Factor 1Heat Shock Protein gene coalescencehexanediolMsn2/Msn4phase separationRNA Pol IIRNA Pol IIItranscriptional condensates

Identifiers

PMID35963432
PMCPMC9486037
OpenAlexW4290988185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.