Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35963263›Full record

Observational studyThe Lancet. Neurology2022

Prognostic value of day-of-injury plasma GFAP and UCH-L1 concentrations for predicting functional recovery after traumatic brain injury in patients from the US TRACK-TBI cohort: an observational cohort study.

Frederick K Korley, Sonia Jain, Xiaoying Sun, Ava M Puccio, John K Yue, Raquel C Gardner, Kevin K W Wang, David O Okonkwo, Esther L Yuh, Pratik Mukherjee and 6 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Lancet. Neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 139 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
139citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
22.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02119182 completednot on this map

Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2014 to 2020Enrolled2,996ConditionsTraumatic Brain InjuryArmsIn-Person Outcome Assessment, Phone Outcome Assessment, 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Blood Draw for Plasma, DNA, Serum, RNA
NCT06163833 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

MATRIx: MesenchymAl Stromal Cells for Traumatic bRain Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei TintoriRan2023 to 2026Enrolled78ConditionsTraumatic Brain Injury With Loss of ConsciousnessArmsMesenchymal stromal cell low dosage-80*10^6 cells, Mesenchymal stromal cell low dosage-160*10^6 cells, Placebo-storage solution
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

139 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 192 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Nanozyme-based therapeutic strategies for traumatic brain injury.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Observational
  19. Observational
  20. Review

79 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Frederick K KorleyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: korley@med.umich.edu.
Sonia JainHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Xiaoying SunHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Ava M PuccioDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
John K YueDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Raquel C GardnerDepartment of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Kevin K W WangProgram for Neurotrauma, Neuroproteomics and Biomarkers Research, Department of Emergency Medicine, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
David O OkonkwoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Esther L YuhDepartment of Radiology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Pratik MukherjeeDepartment of Radiology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Lindsay D NelsonDepartment of Neurosurgery and Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Sabrina R TaylorBrain and Spinal Injury Center, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Amy J MarkowitzDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Ramon Diaz-ArrastiaDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Traumatic Brain Injury Clinical Research Center, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Geoffrey T ManleyDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
TRACK-TBI Study Investigators
Neurological Surgery · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USHuman Longevity (United States) · USMedical College of Wisconsin · US

Funding

Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain InjuryU01NS086090 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DIAZ-ARRASTIA, RAMON, GIACINO, JOSEPH THOMAS · 2013 to 2017
$19.1M
Transforming Traumatic Brain Injury Research and Clinical CareRC2NS069409 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MANLEY, GEOFFREY T · 2009 to 2011
$4.3M
Clinical Validation of Serum Neurofilament Light as a Biomarker of Traumatic Axonal InjuryU01NS114140 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DIAZ-ARRASTIA, RAMON · 2020 to 2025
$3.9M
NINDS NIH HHS RC2 NS069409NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS086090NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS114140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prognostic value of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) as day-of-injury predictors of functional outcome after traumatic brain injury is not well understood. GFAP is a protein found in glial cells and UCH-L1 is found in neurons, and these biomarkers have been cleared to aid in decision making regarding whether brain CT should be performed after traumatic brain injury. We aimed to quantify their prognostic accuracy and investigate whether these biomarkers contribute novel prognostic information to existing clinical models.

methodsWe enrolled patients from the Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI) observational cohort study. TRACK-TBI includes patients 17 years and older who are evaluated for TBI at 18 US level 1 trauma centres. All patients receive head CT at evaluation, have adequate visual acuity and hearing preinjury, and are fluent in either English or Spanish. In our analysis, we included participants aged 17-90 years who had day-of-injury plasma samples for measurement of GFAP and UCH-L1 and completed 6-month assessments for outcome due to traumatic brain injury with the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE-TBI). Biomarkers were analysed as continuous variables and in quintiles. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02119182.

findingsWe enrolled 2552 patients from Feb 26, 2014, to Aug 8, 2018. Of the 1696 participants with brain injury and data available at baseline and at 6 months who were included in the analysis, 120 (7·1%) died (GOSE-TBI=1), 235 (13·9%) had an unfavourable outcome (ie, GOSE-TBI ≤4), 1135 (66·9%) had incomplete recovery (ie, GOSE-TBI <8), and 561 (33·1%) recovered fully (ie, GOSE-TBI=8). The area under the curve (AUC) of GFAP for predicting death at 6 months in all patients was 0·87 (95% CI 0·83-0·91), for unfavourable outcome was 0·86 (0·83-0·89), and for incomplete recovery was 0·62 (0·59-0·64). The corresponding AUCs for UCH-L1 were 0·89 (95% CI 0·86-0·92) for predicting death, 0·86 (0·84-0·89) for unfavourable outcome, and 0·61 (0·59-0·64) for incomplete recovery at 6 months. AUCs were higher for participants with traumatic brain injury and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 3-12 than for those with GCS score of 13-15. Among participants with GCS score of 3-12 (n=353), adding GFAP and UCH-L1 (alone or combined) to each of the three International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in traumatic brain injury models significantly increased their AUCs for predicting death (AUC range 0·90-0·94) and unfavourable outcome (AUC range 0·83-0·89). However, among participants with GCS score of 13-15 (n=1297), adding GFAP and UCH-L1 to the UPFRONT study model modestly increased the AUC for predicting incomplete recovery (AUC range 0·69-0·69, p=0·025).

interpretationIn addition to their known diagnostic value, day-of-injury GFAP and UCH-L1 plasma concentrations have good to excellent prognostic value for predicting death and unfavourable outcome, but not for predicting incomplete recovery at 6 months. These biomarkers contribute the most prognostic information for participants presenting with a GCS score of 3-12.

fundingUS National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke, US Department of Defense, One Mind, US Army Medical Research and Development Command.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticBiomarkersCohort StudiesGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinHumansPrognosisProspective StudiesUbiquitin ThiolesteraseUnited StatesBiomarkersGFAP protein, humanGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinUbiquitin carboxyl-Terminal Hydrolase L-1, humanUbiquitin Thiolesterase

Identifiers

PMID35963263
PMCPMC9462598
OpenAlexW4291396593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.