Observational studyThe Lancet. Neurology2022
Prognostic value of day-of-injury plasma GFAP and UCH-L1 concentrations for predicting functional recovery after traumatic brain injury in patients from the US TRACK-TBI cohort: an observational cohort study.
Observational study in The Lancet. Neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 139 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury
MATRIx: MesenchymAl Stromal Cells for Traumatic bRain Injury
Who cites it
139 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 192 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploiting blood-based biomarkers to align preclinical models with human traumatic brain injury.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic utility of neurogenic biomarkers in differentiating sepsis with and without associated encephalopathy: a systematic review and meta-analytic approach.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Research on the Potential Biomarkers of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: a Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis.Molecular neurobiology · 2023Pooled it
- Effect of riluzole on cognitive and functional outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial.BMC neurology · 2026Trial
- Nanozyme-based therapeutic strategies for traumatic brain injury.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Review
- Association between acute GFAP status and 6-month cognitive performance after mild traumatic brain injury: an exploratory follow-up study.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Mild and repetitive mild traumatic brain injury: Changes in microglial cells and synapses.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Repeated impacts induce acute neurobehavioral and molecular deficits in a mouse model of traumatic brain injury.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
- Improving the Outcome of Brain-Injured Patients by Non-Continuous Feeding to Prevent Dysbiosis.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Whole-blood point-of-care glial fibrillary acidic protein and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 biomarkers after traumatic brain injury in the US: a prospective diagnostic prediction of intracranial injury on head CT.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
- Measurement of Central Nervous System-Related Biomarkers in Plasma of Burn Patients.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2026Article
- Prognostic Value of MRI Anatomical Radiologic Scores for One-Year Neurological Outcome After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.Neurocritical care · 2026Observational
- Neurofilament Light Protein: A Marker for Injury Severity, Clinical Course, and Outcome Following Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Consensus statements for the diagnosis of mild traumatic brain injury and clinical integration of blood-based biomarkers in the Asia-Pacific region: a modified Delphi study.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Improving mortality prediction in older adults with traumatic brain injury: incorporating neurological and imaging scores into Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score.World journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Analytical Performance and Evaluation in Clinical Cohorts of a Fully Automated Immunoassay for Plasma Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Observational
- Proteomic blood-based biomarkers of brain damage in traumatic brain injury: are they suitable surrogate endpoints for cerebral pressure autoregulatory-guided therapy?Critical care (London, England) · 2026Observational
- Validation of Blood-Based Biomarkers After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury with GCS 15 in a Singapore Emergency Department: An Observational Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- Updates in Management of Acute Disorders of Consciousness After Traumatic Injury.Brain sciences · 2026Review
79 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe prognostic value of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) as day-of-injury predictors of functional outcome after traumatic brain injury is not well understood. GFAP is a protein found in glial cells and UCH-L1 is found in neurons, and these biomarkers have been cleared to aid in decision making regarding whether brain CT should be performed after traumatic brain injury. We aimed to quantify their prognostic accuracy and investigate whether these biomarkers contribute novel prognostic information to existing clinical models.
methodsWe enrolled patients from the Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI) observational cohort study. TRACK-TBI includes patients 17 years and older who are evaluated for TBI at 18 US level 1 trauma centres. All patients receive head CT at evaluation, have adequate visual acuity and hearing preinjury, and are fluent in either English or Spanish. In our analysis, we included participants aged 17-90 years who had day-of-injury plasma samples for measurement of GFAP and UCH-L1 and completed 6-month assessments for outcome due to traumatic brain injury with the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE-TBI). Biomarkers were analysed as continuous variables and in quintiles. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02119182.
findingsWe enrolled 2552 patients from Feb 26, 2014, to Aug 8, 2018. Of the 1696 participants with brain injury and data available at baseline and at 6 months who were included in the analysis, 120 (7·1%) died (GOSE-TBI=1), 235 (13·9%) had an unfavourable outcome (ie, GOSE-TBI ≤4), 1135 (66·9%) had incomplete recovery (ie, GOSE-TBI <8), and 561 (33·1%) recovered fully (ie, GOSE-TBI=8). The area under the curve (AUC) of GFAP for predicting death at 6 months in all patients was 0·87 (95% CI 0·83-0·91), for unfavourable outcome was 0·86 (0·83-0·89), and for incomplete recovery was 0·62 (0·59-0·64). The corresponding AUCs for UCH-L1 were 0·89 (95% CI 0·86-0·92) for predicting death, 0·86 (0·84-0·89) for unfavourable outcome, and 0·61 (0·59-0·64) for incomplete recovery at 6 months. AUCs were higher for participants with traumatic brain injury and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 3-12 than for those with GCS score of 13-15. Among participants with GCS score of 3-12 (n=353), adding GFAP and UCH-L1 (alone or combined) to each of the three International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in traumatic brain injury models significantly increased their AUCs for predicting death (AUC range 0·90-0·94) and unfavourable outcome (AUC range 0·83-0·89). However, among participants with GCS score of 13-15 (n=1297), adding GFAP and UCH-L1 to the UPFRONT study model modestly increased the AUC for predicting incomplete recovery (AUC range 0·69-0·69, p=0·025).
interpretationIn addition to their known diagnostic value, day-of-injury GFAP and UCH-L1 plasma concentrations have good to excellent prognostic value for predicting death and unfavourable outcome, but not for predicting incomplete recovery at 6 months. These biomarkers contribute the most prognostic information for participants presenting with a GCS score of 3-12.
fundingUS National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke, US Department of Defense, One Mind, US Army Medical Research and Development Command.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.