Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35962919›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychology review2023

Current Potential for Clinical Optimization of Social Cognition Assessment for Frontotemporal Dementia and Primary Psychiatric Disorders.

Jan Van den Stock, Maxime Bertoux, Janine Diehl-Schmid, Olivier Piguet, Katherine P Rankin, Florence Pasquier, Simon Ducharme, Yolande Pijnenburg, Fiona Kumfor

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychology review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Fourteen years later: Reviewing the diagnostic criteria for behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Jan Van den StockLeuven Brain Institute, Department of Neurosciences, Research Group Psychiatry, Neuropsychiatry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Jan.vandenstock@kuleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0001-5756-3195
Maxime BertouxLille Neurosciences & Cognition Institute, Labex DISTALZ, Univ. Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, Lille, France.
Janine Diehl-SchmidSchool of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Olivier PiguetBrain and Mind Centre and School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Katherine P RankinDepartment of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Florence PasquierLille Neurosciences & Cognition Institute, Labex DISTALZ, Univ. Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, Lille, France.
Simon DucharmeDepartment of Psychiatry, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Yolande PijnenburgDepartment of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Fiona KumforBrain and Mind Centre and School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Inserm · FRThe University of Sydney · AUAllen Institute for Brain Science · USAmsterdam Neuroscience · NLMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital · CATechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Attention and Semantic Evaluation as Predictors of Empathy in Healthy Aging and Frontotemporal DementiaRF1AG029577 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI RANKIN, KATHERINE P · 2019 to 2019
$4.0M
NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG029577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dodich and colleagues recently reviewed the evidence supporting clinical use of social cognition assessment in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (Dodich et al., 2021). Here, we comment on their methods and present an initiative to address some of the limitations that emerged from their study. In particular, we established the social cognition workgroup within the Neuropsychiatric International Consortium Frontotemporal dementia (scNIC-FTD), aiming to validate social cognition assessment for diagnostic purposes and tracking of change across clinical situations.

Indexed as

Frontotemporal DementiaCognitionHumansNeuropsychological TestsSocial CognitionDifferential diagnosisFrontotemporal dementiaPrimary psychiatric disordersSocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID35962919
OpenAlexW4291196688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.