Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35962911›Full record

ArticleBioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy2022

Understanding US Physician and Pharmacist Attitudes Toward Biosimilar Products: A Qualitative Study.

Douglas J Rupert, Alyssa M Jordan, Marina A Ziemian, Rachel M Brown, Neil S Fleming, R Craig Lefebvre

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Douglas J RupertCenter for Communication Science, RTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA. drupert@rti.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6701-4552
Alyssa M JordanCenter for Communication Science, RTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0411-2467
Marina A ZiemianStack Data Strategy, London, UK.
Rachel M BrownSchool of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2604-586X
Neil S FlemingRobbins Institute for Health Policy & Leadership, Hankamer School of Business, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0626-5662
R Craig LefebvreCenter for Communication Science, RTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1764-3013

Funding

U.S. Food and Drug Administration HHSF223201400527G
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiosimilars account for 30-40% of biologic medications dispensed in the United States (US), yet healthcare providers in relevant medical specialties have limited awareness of biosimilars and their characteristics. Likewise, many providers perceive biosimilars as less safe and effective than original biologics and are more comfortable prescribing original biologics to patients.

methodsWe conducted in-person focus groups at three clinical sites in California and Texas (n = 49) to explore the reasons behind US healthcare providers' limited understanding of, cautious attitudes toward, and reluctance to prescribe biosimilars. We conducted thematic analysis by having three researchers independently analyze verbatim transcripts and identify patterns in provider responses.

resultsProviders' limited knowledge of and cautious attitudes toward biosimilars are driven by uncertainty about how biosimilarity is defined and operationalized as well as negative past experiences with generic drugs that did not perform as well as branded counterparts. Additionally, healthcare providers are unfamiliar with the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) approval pathway for biosimilars and are skeptical that an abbreviated approval process is rigorous enough to ensure biosimilars deliver the same efficacy and have the same side effect profiles as original biologics. Physicians also expressed concerns about pharmacy substitution of biosimilars and interchangeables, explaining they would be unaware of which medication was ultimately given to their patients.

conclusionsEducating physicians and pharmacists about biosimilars-including how biosimilarity is defined and operationalized, the structure of the biosimilar approval process, and how analytical data can ensure biosimilar safety and efficacy-will be important for reducing healthcare providers' concerns and increasing biosimilar adoption in the US.

Indexed as

Biosimilar PharmaceuticalsPhysiciansDrug ApprovalDrugs, GenericHumansPharmacistsUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsDrugs, Generic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.