ArticlePsychometrika2023
Accurate Assessment via Process Data.
Article in Psychometrika, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating Neural Networks Architectures for Competency Prediction from Process Data Using PISA Computer-Based Mathematics Assessment.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
- Reducing Differential Item Functioning via Process Data.Psychometrika · 2025Article
- Generative Adversarial Networks for High-Dimensional Item Factor Analysis: A Deep Adversarial Learning Algorithm.Psychometrika · 2025Article
- Explaining Performance Gaps with Problem-Solving Process Data via Latent Class Mediation Analysis.Psychometrika · 2025Article
- Investigating the Predictive Performance of Process Data and Result Data in Complex Problem Solving Using the Conditional Gradient Boosting Algorithm.Journal of Intelligence · 2025Article
- Joint modeling of action sequences and action time in computer-based interactive tasks.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- Scalable Bayesian Approach for the Dina Q-Matrix Estimation Combining Stochastic Optimization and Variational Inference.Psychometrika · 2023Article
- ProcData: An R Package for Process Data Analysis.Psychometrika · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate assessment of a student's ability is the key task of a test. Assessments based on final responses are the standard. As the infrastructure advances, substantially more information is observed. One of such instances is the process data that is collected by computer-based interactive items and contain a student's detailed interactive processes. In this paper, we show both theoretically and with simulated and empirical data that appropriately including such information in the assessment will substantially improve relevant assessment precision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35962849What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.