Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35962791›Full record

ReviewAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2022

Current status and outlook of advances in exosome isolation.

Wen-Zhao Liu, Zhan-Jun Ma, Xue-Wen Kang

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Wen-Zhao Liu *The Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730030, Gansu, China.
Zhan-Jun Ma *Louvain Drug Research Institute, Advanced Drug Delivery and Biomaterials, Université Catholique de Louvain, UCLouvain, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Xue-Wen KangThe Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730030, Gansu, China. ery_kangxw@lzu.edu.cn.
Lanzhou University · CNUCLouvain · BE

Funding

Cuiying Scientific Training Program for Undergraduates of Lanzhou University Second Hospital 03Cuiying Scientific Training Program for Undergraduates of Lanzhou University Second Hospital CYXZ2020-02the Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province 20JR10RA735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exosomes are extracellular vesicles with a diameter ranging from 30 to 150 nm, which are an important medium for intercellular communication and are closely related to the progression of certain diseases. Therefore, exosomes are considered promising biomarkers for the diagnosis of specific diseases, and thereby, treatments based on exosomes are being widely examined. For exosome-related research, a rapid, simple, high-purity, and recovery isolation method is the primary prerequisite for exosomal large-scale application in medical practice. Although there are no standardized methods for exosome separation and analysis, various techniques have been established to explore their biochemical and physicochemical properties. In this review, we analyzed the progress in exosomal isolation strategies and proposed our views on the development prospects of various exosomal isolation techniques.

Indexed as

ExosomesBiomarkersBiomarkersExosomeExtracellular vesicleIsolationMicrofluidicSeparation

Identifiers

PMID35962791
PMCPMC9375199
OpenAlexW4291201779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.