Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35962483›Full record

ArticleEcology letters2022

Integrating eco-evolutionary dynamics and modern coexistence theory.

Masato Yamamichi, Theo Gibbs, Jonathan M Levine

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Masato YamamichiSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2136-3399
Theo GibbsLewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1515-8420
Jonathan M LevineDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2857-7904

Funding

HMEI Biodiversity Grand Challenge AwardJapan Society for the Promotion of Science 19K16223Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20KK0169Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 21H02560National Science Foundation DEB 2022213National Science Foundation DGE-2039656Strategic Partnership Teaching and Research Collaboration Seed Grant of Princeton University and the University of Tokyo
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community ecology typically assumes that competitive exclusion and species coexistence are unaffected by evolution on the time scale of ecological dynamics. However, recent studies suggest that rapid evolution operating concurrently with competition may enable species coexistence. Such findings necessitate general theory that incorporates the coexistence contributions of eco-evolutionary processes in parallel with purely ecological mechanisms and provides metrics for quantifying the role of evolution in shaping competitive outcomes in both modelling and empirical contexts. To foster the development of such theory, here we extend the interpretation of the two principal metrics of modern coexistence theory-niche and competitive ability differences-to systems where competitors evolve. We define eco-evolutionary versions of these metrics by considering how invading and resident species adapt to conspecific and heterospecific competitors. We show that the eco-evolutionary niche and competitive ability differences are sums of ecological and evolutionary processes, and that they accurately predict the potential for stable coexistence in previous theoretical studies of eco-evolutionary dynamics. Finally, we show how this theory frames recent empirical assessments of rapid evolution effects on species coexistence, and how empirical work and theory on species coexistence and eco-evolutionary dynamics can be further integrated.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionModels, TheoreticalAdaptation, PhysiologicalEcosystemPopulation DynamicsChesson's coexistence theorycompetitive ability differencedensity-dependent selectioneco-evolutionary dynamicseco-evolutionary feedbacksLotka-Volterra competition modelneighbour-dependent selectionpopulation cyclesrapid evolutionstabilising niche difference

Identifiers

PMID35962483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.