Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35962454›Full record

Trial reportJournal of translational medicine2022

Fecal microbiota transplantation versus glucocorticoids for the induction of remission in mild to moderate ulcerative colitis.

Chunlan Huang, Zehua Huang, Ling Ding, Yang Fu, Junjie Fan, Qixiang Mei, Lihong Lou, Jingjing Wang, Nuoming Yin, Yingying Lu and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02435160 (The Study of Efficacy and Mechanism in Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02435160 phase2 / phase3unknown statusnot on this map

The Study of Efficacy and Mechanism in Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorJun LiuRan2015Enrolled20ConditionsUlcerative Colitis, Fecal Microbiota TransplantationArmsFecal Microbiota Transplantation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. OralFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chunlan Huang *Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 650 Xinsongjiang Road, Songjiang District, Shanghai, China.
Zehua Huang *Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 650 Xinsongjiang Road, Songjiang District, Shanghai, China.
Ling Ding *Department of Infectious Diseases, Central People's Hospital of Zhanjiang, Zhanjiang, Guangdong Province, China.
Yang FuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 650 Xinsongjiang Road, Songjiang District, Shanghai, China.
Junjie FanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 650 Xinsongjiang Road, Songjiang District, Shanghai, China.
Qixiang MeiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 650 Xinsongjiang Road, Songjiang District, Shanghai, China.
Lihong LouInternational Medical Care Center, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jingjing WangShanghai Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Diseases, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Nuoming YinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 650 Xinsongjiang Road, Songjiang District, Shanghai, China.
Yingying LuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 650 Xinsongjiang Road, Songjiang District, Shanghai, China.
Sanwei GuoDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University, No. 301, Middle Yanchang Road, Jingan District, Shanghai, China. guosanwei@yeah.net.
Yue ZengDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 650 Xinsongjiang Road, Songjiang District, Shanghai, China. carrie_1004@sjtu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-8915-6500
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNCentral People's Hospital of Zhanjiang · CNTongji University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) with glucocorticoid as induction therapy in ulcerative colitis (UC).

methodsThe patients with active mild to moderate UC were recruited into the single-center, prospective cohort study. The patients were treated with either FMT (FMT group) or glucocorticoids (GCs group). Patients received FMT administration for 3 days. The primary outcome was clinical and endoscopic remission at week 12. Inflammatory parameters were assessed by routine blood tests. Safety was assessed by adverse events recorded. The serum levels of TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10 IL-8, IL-12p70, IL-13, IL-17A and IL-23 following FMT were measured by Luminex multiplex assay.

resultsOf the 122 patients, 62 patients were treated with FMT and 60 with glucocorticoids. 34 patients in FMT group (54.8%) and 29 in GCs group (48.3%) reached the primary outcome (p = 0.30). The incidence of adverse events in GCs group (35/60, 58.3%) was significantly higher than that in FMT group (14/62, 22.6%) and two serious adverse events were observed following GCs. Patients in FMT group were stratified into responders (RE) and non-responders (NR) groups. The level of TNF-α and IL-6 decreased significantly in RE group, while IL-10 decreased significantly in NR group.

conclusionFMT therapy was as effective as glucocorticoids to induce remission in active mild to moderate UC, accompanied by fewer adverse events. The modification of serum TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-10 might be related to the efficacy of FMT in UC. Trial registration This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02435160). Registered on 6 April, 2015. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=&term=NCT02435160&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=.

Indexed as

Colitis, UlcerativeFecal Microbiota TransplantationGlucocorticoidsHumansInterleukin-10Interleukin-6Prospective StudiesRemission InductionTreatment OutcomeTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaGlucocorticoidsInterleukin-10Interleukin-6Tumor Necrosis Factor-alphaFecal microbiota transplantationGlucocorticoidSerum cytokinesUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID35962454
PMCPMC9373544
OpenAlexW4291149859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.