ArticleBMC palliative care2022
Psychometric validation of the death literacy index and benchmarking of death literacy level in a representative uk population sample.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Death Anxiety, Spiritual Well-Being, and Death Literacy Among Relatives of Patients Receiving Palliative Care in Türkiye: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Death Literacy and Death Competence in Undergraduate Clinical and Allied Health Education: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Exploring death literacy with allied health professionals: A cross-sectional survey in Australia.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Identifying the pathways to increased death literacy: Building a conceptual causal model through a mixed-methods pragmatic ESC-DAGs approach.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Mapping death literacy in the East of England: A cross-sectional survey with qualitative insights to inform public health strategy.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Lived experiences of well-intended but hurtful cancer communication: Insights for death literacy.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Associations between sociodemographic factors, experience of death and dying, and death literacy: A nationally representative cross-sectional study.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Investigating effect versus impact in a participatory action research project: Building end-of-life communication competence in residential care facilities for older people.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Patient characteristics associated with death literacy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A preliminary single-centre cross-sectional study.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Translation and validation of the revised and short forms of the Death Literacy Index in the Chinese population.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Death literacy: Tensions between theory and practice.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Strengthening death literacy in multicultural communities: Community-led interventions and cross-cultural validation of the Death Literacy Index.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Last Aid Courses as a Means for Public Palliative Care Education-A Narrative Review of the Literature and 10 Years of Experience Around the World with Implications for Future Research.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Development and validation of the Japanese version of the Death Literacy Index (DLI-J) and its short form (DLI-J-9).PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025Article
- Adopting the lens of the COM-B behaviour change model to qualitatively explore and understand public health implications of young adults' attitudes towards death-talk.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Death Literacy and Related Factors Among Nursing Students in Turkey: The Role of Spiritual Well-Being.Journal of religion and health · 2025Article
- Perceptions of Good Death and Death Literacy Levels of Nurses Working in Palliative Care: A Cross-Sectional Study.International nursing review · 2025Article
- Death anxiety and death literacy among Turkish patients with chronic diseases: a cross-sectional study.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Knowledge and practices of youth awareness on death and dying in school settings: a systematic scoping review protocol.Systematic reviews · 2024Article
- Death Literacy for a Public Health Palliative Care Approach in Brunei.Oman medical journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDeath literacy includes the knowledge and skills that people need to gain access to, understand, and make informed choices about end of life and death care options. The Death Literacy Index (DLI) can be used to determine levels of death literacy across multiple contexts, including at a community/national level, and to evaluate the outcome of public health interventions. As the first measure of death literacy, the DLI has potential to significantly advance public health approaches to palliative care. The current study aimed to provide the first assessment of the psychometric properties of the DLI in the UK, alongside population-level benchmarks.
methodsA large nationally representative sample of 399 participants, stratified by age, gender and ethnicity, were prospectively recruited via an online panel. The factor structure of the 29-item DLI was investigated using confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency of subscales was assessed alongside interpretability. Hypothesised associations with theoretically related/unrelated constructs were examined to assess convergent and discriminant validity. Descriptive statistics were used to provide scaled mean scores on the DLI.
resultsConfirmatory factor analysis supported the original higher-order 8 factor structure, with the best fitting model including one substituted item developed specifically for UK respondents. The subscales reported high internal consistency. Good convergent and discriminant validity was evidenced in relation to objective knowledge of the death system, death competency, actions relating to death and dying in the community and loneliness. Good known-groups validity was achieved with respondents with professional/lived experience of end-of-life care reporting higher levels of death literacy. There was little socio-demographic variability in DLI scores. Scaled population-level mean scores were near the mid-point of DLI subscale/total, with comparatively high levels of experiential knowledge and the ability to talk about death and dying.
conclusionsPsychometric evaluations suggest the DLI is a reliable and valid measure of death literacy for use in the UK, with population level benchmarks suggesting the UK population could strengthen capacity in factual knowledge and accessing help. International validation of the DLI represents a significant advancement in outcome measurement for public health approaches to palliative care. PRE-REGISTRATION: https://osf.io/fwxkh/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.