ArticleBMC health services research2022
Effective access to health care in Mexico.
Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Survival Outcomes Among Women With Breast Cancer Across Different Health Systems in Veracruz, Mexico.Cureus · 2026Article
- Catastrophic and impoverishing health expenditures in fragmented public health systems: lessons from Mexico, 2000-2022.Health economics review · 2026Article
- Clinical and economic burden of herpes zoster in Mexico: A retrospective medical chart analysis in a private healthcare setting.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Health insurance coverage in Mexico: progress, inequalities and remaining challenges towards UHC2030.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Cognitive Frailty and Health Care Utilization and Costs Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Findings from Four Longitudinal Cohort Studies.Aging and disease · 2025Article
- Global trends in polycystic ovarian syndrome over 30 years: an age-period-cohort study of 204 countries and territories (1990-2021).Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025Article
- Health system financing fragmentation and maternal mortality transition in Mexico, 2000-2022.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Over-the-counter medication use among Mexican immigrants in Southern Arizona: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Surgical delay in appendicitis among children: the role of social vulnerability.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Examining Physicians' Approaches to Treating Relatives in Primary Health Care Centers: Insights from a Qualitative Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Access to public health care and associated factors in rural areas: a cross-sectional community-based study in Bopa district, Southern Benin.The Pan African medical journal · 2024Article
- Equity in out-of-pocket health expenditure: Evidence from a health insurance program reform in Mexico.Journal of global health · 2023Article
- Use of Outpatient Health Services by Mexicans Aged 15 Years and Older, According to Ethnicity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis paper assesses the impact of effective access on out-of-pocket health payments and catastrophic health expenditure. Effective access cannot be attained unless both health services and financial risk protection are accessible, affordable, and acceptable. Therefore, it represents a key determinant in the transition from fragmented health systems to universal coverage that many low- and middle-income countries face.
methodsWe use a definition of effective access as the utilization of health insurance when available. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using the 2018 Mexican National Health Survey (ENSANUT) at the household level. The analysis is performed in two stages. The first stage is a multinomial analysis that captures the factor associated with choosing effective access against the alternative of paying privately. The second stage consists of an impact analysis regarding the decision of not choosing effective access in terms of out-of-pocket (OOP) health payments and catastrophic health expenditures (CHE). The analysis corrects for both the decision to buy insurance and the decision to pay for health care.
resultsWe found that, on average, not choosing effective access increases OOP health payments by around 2300 pesos annually. Medicine payments are the most common factor in this increase. Nevertheless, outpatient and medicines health care are the main drivers of the increase in OOP health payments in all insurance beneficiaries. Not having effective access increases the probability of CHE health expenditures by 2.7 p.p. for the case of Social Security Insurance and 4.0 p.p. for Social Government insurance. Household enrolled in Prospera program for the poor are more likely to choose effective access while having household heads with more education and assets value does the opposite. Diabetes illnesses are associated with a higher probability of effective access.
conclusionImproving effective access is a middle step that cannot be disregarded when seeking universal coverage because OOP health payments and catastrophic outcomes are direct consequences. Public insurance in general, has around 50% effective access which remains a challenge in terms of health services utilization and health public policy design, calling for the need of better coordination across insurance types and pooling mechanisms to increase sustainability of needed health services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.