ArticleJournal of translational medicine2022
Comprehensive characterization of clonality of driver genes revealing their clinical relevance in colorectal cancer.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of CD155 expression in cancer patients: a meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Transcriptomic profile of RNA pseudouridine modification as a biomarker for cellular senescence associated with survival outcomes in colorectal cancer.BMC biology · 2025Article
- IL-4-Induced Gene 1: A Potential Player in Myocardial Infarction.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Identifying tumour microenvironment-related signature that correlates with prognosis and immunotherapy response in breast cancer.Scientific data · 2023Article
- LncTarD 2.0: an updated comprehensive database for experimentally-supported functional lncRNA-target regulations in human diseases.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- CpG Site-Based Signature Predicts Survival of Colorectal Cancer.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Identifying enhancer-driven subtype-specific prognostic markers in breast cancer based on multi-omics data.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGenomic studies of colorectal cancer have revealed the complex genomic heterogeneity of the tumor. The acquisition and selection of genomic alterations may be critical to understanding the initiation and progression of this disease.
methodsIn this study, we have systematically characterized the clonal architecture of 97 driver genes in 536 colorectal cancer patients from TCGA.
resultsA high proportion of clonal mutations in 93 driver genes were observed. 40 genes showed significant associations between their clonality and multiple clinicopathologic factors. Kaplan-Meier analysis suggested that the mutation clonality of ANK1, CASP8, SMAD2, and ARID1A had a significant impact on the CRC patients' outcomes. Multivariable analysis revealed that subclonal ANK1 mutations, clonal CASP8 mutations, and clonal SMAD2 mutations independently predicted for shorter overall survival after adjusting for clinicopathological factors. The poor outcome of the subclonal ANK1 mutation may be caused by upregulation of IL4I1, IDO1, IFNG and MAPK12 which showed potential roles in tumor immune evasion through accumulation of immunosuppressive cells such as regulatory T cells and myeloid derived suppressor cells.
conclusionThese results suggested that the clonality of driver genes could act as prognostic markers and potential therapeutic targets in human colorectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.