Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35962335›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Consumer-driven strategies towards a resilient and sustainable food system following the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia.

Katherine Kent, Fred Gale, Beth Penrose, Stuart Auckland, Elizabeth Lester, Sandra Murray

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. How do supermarkets shape the experience of vulnerable people in Australia's food system? A scoping review.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2026
    Article
  2. Quantifying the locality of the food supply in a large healthcare organisation.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2025
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Nutrients · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine KentSchool of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia. k.kent@westernsydney.edu.au.
Fred GaleSchool of Social Sciences, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia.
Beth PenroseTasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia.
Stuart AucklandCentre for Rural Health, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia.
Elizabeth LesterInstitute for Social Change, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia.
Sandra MurraySchool of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia.
University of Tasmania · AUWestern Sydney University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic and associated public health restrictions temporarily disrupted food supply chains around the world and changed the way people shopped for food, highlighting issues with food systems resilience and sustainability. The aim of this study was to explore consumer-driven strategies towards a more resilient and sustainable food system in Australia, learning from experiences during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsDuring May-June 2020, a cross-sectional, online survey was conducted in Tasmania, Australia in a non-random sample of adults aged 18 years and over. The survey collected demographic data and posted the open-ended question: "How could Tasmania's food system be better prepared for a disaster in the future?" Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the demographic data and thematic analysis was employed to analyse the qualitative data.

resultsSurvey respondents (n = 698) were predominantly female (79%), over 55 years of age (48%), university educated (70%) and living with dependents (45%). Seven key themes were identified: (i) balance food exports with local needs; (ii) strengthen local food systems; (iii) increase consumer awareness of food supply chains; (iv) build collaboration and connection in the food system; (v) embed clear contingency arrangements; (vi) support community capacity building and individual self-sufficiency; and (vii) the food system coped well.

conclusionsThe consumer-driven strategies identified indicate multiple opportunities to increase resilience and sustainability in the food system to avoid future supply disruptions. Our findings indicate that considerable popular support for more resilient, local and sustainable food systems may be emerging from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdolescentAdultAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFood SupplyHumansMalePandemicsCommunity resilienceCOVID-19Food accessFood insecurityFood systemSustainability

Identifiers

PMID35962335
PMCPMC9373895
OpenAlexW4290861047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.