ArticleInternational journal of hematology2022
Clinical diagnostic accuracy of respiratory failure in critically ill hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleAcute respiratory failure (ARF) is a frequent complication following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We aimed to characterize the etiologies of ARF in patients who died in the intensive care unit following HCT based on autopsy findings. We then evaluated agreement between the clinical and pathologic diagnosis.
methodsWe performed a chart review of all HCT patients who died and underwent autopsy in our ICU between 2006-2016. We evaluated the presumed clinical diagnosis and confidence in the diagnosis by chart review, the pathologic diagnosis on autopsy, and whether the clinical-pathologic diagnoses were concordant. When there was discordance, we evaluated whether knowledge of the pathology could have changed management.
resultsThirteen patients underwent autopsy after dying. Infection was the presumed cause in 11/13 cases. The clinical and pathologic diagnoses were concordant in 6/13(46%). In the seven discordant cases (all clinically diagnosed as infection), autopsy revealed two non-infectious inflammatory causes, one post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, and three non-bacterial infectious etiology. Pathologic findings may have changed management in 7/13(54%) cases.
conclusionsIn a subset of HCT-recipients who died from respiratory failure, discordance was frequent between clinical and pathologic diagnoses. The risks and benefits of obtaining tissue to improve our diagnostic accuracy requires further evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.