Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35962267›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2022

ALARA in Urology: Steps to Minimise Radiation Exposure During All Parts of the Endourological Journey.

Radhika Bhanot, Zeeshan B M Hameed, Milap Shah, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Andreas Skolarikos, Bhaskar Somani

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Ureteral access sheath. Does it improve the results of flexible ureteroscopy? A narrative review.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Radhika BhanotDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3842-328X
Zeeshan B M HameedDepartment of Urology, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Milap ShahDepartment of Urology, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Patrick Juliebø-JonesDept of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Andreas SkolarikosDepartment of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Bhaskar SomaniDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK. bhaskarsomani@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the reviewThe global burden of kidney stone disease (KSD) and its management relies on ionising radiation. This includes the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of KSD patients. The concept 'As Low As Reasonably Achievable' (ALARA) developed in response to the radiation risks and the key principles include optimisation, justification and limitation of radiation. This article provides an overview of the topic including background to the risks and steps that can be taken during all stages of endourological management. RECENT

findingsOur review suggests that ionising radiation is an invaluable tool in delineating the anatomy, localising disease, guiding manoeuvres and monitoring treatment in patients with KSD. It therefore plays an integral role in many stages of patient care; preoperatively, intraoperatively and postoperatively. The reduction of radiation pre- and post-surgical intervention relies on the use of low-radiation CT scan and ultrasound scan. It can also be achieved through various intraoperative techniques or fluoroless techniques in selected patients/procedures, customised to the patients and procedural complexity. There are many parts of the patient journey where exposure to radiation can take place. Urologists must be diligent to minimise and mitigate this wherever possible as they too face exposure risks. Implementation of strategies such as teaching programmes, fluoroscopy checklists and judicious use of CT imaging among other things is a step towards improving practice in this area.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiRadiation ExposureUrologyFluoroscopyHumansTomography, X-Ray ComputedALARAEndourologyKidney calculiPercutaneous nephrolithotomyRadiationSafetyUreteroscopy

Identifiers

PMID35962267
PMCPMC9569289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.