Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35962241›Full record

ReviewPsychonomic bulletin & review2023

I'm not sure that curve means what you think it means: Toward a [more] realistic understanding of the role of eye-movement generation in the Visual World Paradigm.

Bob McMurray

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Eye-Movement Suppression in the Visual World Paradigm.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Exposure to co-occurrence regularities in language drives semantic integration of new words.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bob McMurrayDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, 278 PBSB, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA. Bob-mcmurray@uiowa.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6532-284X
University of Iowa · US

Funding

Speech Production &LanguageP50DC000242 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Inyong Choi · 1989 to 2026
$58.8M
The Development of Real Time Spoken and Written Word Recognition: Cognitive Bases of Language and Educational OutcomesR01DC008089 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI MCMURRAY, BOB · 2007 to 2023
$7.3M
Decoding the neural time-course of spoken word recognitionR21DC017596 · NIDCD · HASKINS LABORATORIES, INC. · PI ASLIN, RICHARD N., MCMURRAY, BOB · 2019 to 2020
$430k
NIDCD NIH HHS DC017596NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC000242NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008089NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC017596
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Visual World Paradigm (VWP) is a powerful experimental paradigm for language research. Listeners respond to speech in a "visual world" containing potential referents of the speech. Fixations to these referents provides insight into the preliminary states of language processing as decisions unfold. The VWP has become the dominant paradigm in psycholinguistics and extended to every level of language, development, and disorders. Part of its impact is the impressive data visualizations which reveal the millisecond-by-millisecond time course of processing, and advances have been made in developing new analyses that precisely characterize this time course. All theoretical and statistical approaches make the tacit assumption that the time course of fixations is closely related to the underlying activation in the system. However, given the serial nature of fixations and their long refractory period, it is unclear how closely the observed dynamics of the fixation curves are actually coupled to the underlying dynamics of activation. I investigated this assumption with a series of simulations. Each simulation starts with a set of true underlying activation functions and generates simulated fixations using a simple stochastic sampling procedure that respects the sequential nature of fixations. I then analyzed the results to determine the conditions under which the observed fixations curves match the underlying functions, the reliability of the observed data, and the implications for Type I error and power. These simulations demonstrate that even under the simplest fixation-based models, observed fixation curves are systematically biased relative to the underlying activation functions, and they are substantially noisier, with important implications for reliability and power. I then present a potential generative model that may ultimately overcome many of these issues.

Indexed as

Eye MovementsLanguageFixation, OcularHumansPsycholinguisticsReproducibility of ResultsSpeechEye movementsMonte Carlo simulationsPsycholinguisticsTime series analysisVisual World Paradigm

Identifiers

PMID35962241
PMCPMC10964151
OpenAlexW4290948874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.