ArticlePediatric cardiology2023
Telehealth and Application of Appropriate Use Criteria for Pediatric Transthoracic Echocardiography.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Appropriate use criteria (AUC) for the performance of outpatient transthoracic echocardiography are based on history, physical examination and electrocardiograms. Telehealth provides access to clinical care in the absence of a physical examination. We assessed application of AUC for performance of echocardiography following a telehealth visit. In this single center study, we retrospectively reviewed the charts of pediatric patients whose originally scheduled in person visits were converted to telehealth visits between March and May 2020. Patients were referred for echocardiogram by the telehealth cardiologist. Echocardiograms requested during the telehealth visit were retrospectively classified as appropriate [A], may be appropriate [M], or rarely appropriate [R] by two independent reviewers. Findings from the echocardiogram were classified as normal, abnormal, or abnormal and motivating treatment by the same two independent reviewers based upon results from the echocardiogram report and physician office visit note. Of the 441 patients seen by telehealth, interquartile range of 1.9-15.3 years, 114 (26%) patients were referred for an echocardiogram. Of the patients for whom echocardiograms were requested, 56/114 (49%) were new to cardiology. Echocardiograms were rated: A-85 (75%), M-5 (4%), and R-24 (21%). Of the 108 completed studies, 61 (56%) were normal, 44 (41%) were abnormal, and three (3%) were abnormal motivating treatment. Abnormal TTE findings were not detected in the R encounters compared with abnormal findings in 46/82 (56%) of the A completed studies. Seventy-one percent (15/21) of the R-rated studies were performed for murmur evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.