Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35962027›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Deep learning methods to predict amyotrophic lateral sclerosis disease progression.

Corrado Pancotti, Giovanni Birolo, Cesare Rollo, Tiziana Sanavia, Barbara Di Camillo, Umberto Manera, Adriano Chiò, Piero Fariselli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A neuromuscular clinician's primer on machine learning.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Artificial intelligence for biomarker discovery in Alzheimer's disease and dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Corrado Pancotti *Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Giovanni Birolo *Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126, Turin, Italy. giovanni.birolo@unito.it.
Cesare RolloDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Tiziana SanaviaDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Barbara Di CamilloDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padua, 35131, Padua, Italy.
Umberto ManeraALS Center, "Rita Levi Montalcini" Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Adriano ChiòALS Center, "Rita Levi Montalcini" Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Piero FariselliDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126, Turin, Italy.
University of Turin · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a highly complex and heterogeneous neurodegenerative disease that affects motor neurons. Since life expectancy is relatively low, it is essential to promptly understand the course of the disease to better target the patient's treatment. Predictive models for disease progression are thus of great interest. One of the most extensive and well-studied open-access data resources for ALS is the Pooled Resource Open-Access ALS Clinical Trials (PRO-ACT) repository. In 2015, the DREAM-Phil Bowen ALS Prediction Prize4Life Challenge was held on PRO-ACT data, where competitors were asked to develop machine learning algorithms to predict disease progression measured through the slope of the ALSFRS score between 3 and 12 months. However, although it has already been successfully applied in several studies on ALS patients, to the best of our knowledge deep learning approaches still remain unexplored on the ALSFRS slope prediction in PRO-ACT cohort. Here, we investigate how deep learning models perform in predicting ALS progression using the PRO-ACT data. We developed three models based on different architectures that showed comparable or better performance with respect to the state-of-the-art models, thus representing a valid alternative to predict ALS disease progression.

Indexed as

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisDeep LearningNeurodegenerative DiseasesDisease ProgressionHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID35962027
PMCPMC9374680
OpenAlexW4291142588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.