Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35961774›Full record

ArticleGenome research2022

An atlas of fish genome evolution reveals delayed rediploidization following the teleost whole-genome duplication.

Elise Parey, Alexandra Louis, Jérôme Montfort, Yann Guiguen, Hugues Roest Crollius, Camille Berthelot

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bony fish genomes: Status and gaps.Journal of fish biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The molecular evolution of vertebrate organs.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elise PareyInstitut de Biologie de l'Ecole normale supérieure (IBENS), Département de Biologie, Ecole normale supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3394-2697
Alexandra LouisInstitut de Biologie de l'Ecole normale supérieure (IBENS), Département de Biologie, Ecole normale supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7032-5650
Jérôme MontfortINRAE, LPGP, 35000, Rennes, France.
Yann GuiguenINRAE, LPGP, 35000, Rennes, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5464-6219
Hugues Roest CrolliusInstitut de Biologie de l'Ecole normale supérieure (IBENS), Département de Biologie, Ecole normale supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8209-173X
Camille BerthelotInstitut de Biologie de l'Ecole normale supérieure (IBENS), Département de Biologie, Ecole normale supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5054-2690
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Teleost fishes are ancient tetraploids descended from an ancestral whole-genome duplication that may have contributed to the impressive diversification of this clade. Whole-genome duplications can occur via self-doubling (autopolyploidy) or via hybridization between different species (allopolyploidy). The mode of tetraploidization conditions evolutionary processes by which duplicated genomes return to diploid meiotic pairing, and subsequent genetic divergence of duplicated genes (cytological and genetic rediploidization). How teleosts became tetraploid remains unresolved, leaving a fundamental gap in the interpretation of their functional evolution. As a result of the whole-genome duplication, identifying orthologous and paralogous genomic regions across teleosts is challenging, hindering genome-wide investigations into their polyploid history. Here, we combine tailored gene phylogeny methodology together with a state-of-the-art ancestral karyotype reconstruction to establish the first high-resolution comparative atlas of paleopolyploid regions across 74 teleost genomes. We then leverage this atlas to investigate how rediploidization occurred in teleosts at the genome-wide level. We uncover that some duplicated regions maintained tetraploidy for more than 60 million years, with three chromosome pairs diverging genetically only after the separation of major teleost families. This evidence suggests that the teleost ancestor was an autopolyploid. Further, we find evidence for biased gene retention along several duplicated chromosomes, contradicting current paradigms that asymmetrical evolution is specific to allopolyploids. Altogether, our results offer novel insights into genome evolutionary dynamics following ancient polyploidizations in vertebrates.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularFishesGene DuplicationGenomePhylogenyAnimalsPolyploidyTetraploidy

Identifiers

PMID35961774
PMCPMC9528989
OpenAlexW4290948790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.