Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35961636›Full record

ReviewChemical reviews2022

Glycoinformatics in the Artificial Intelligence Era.

Daniel Bojar, Frederique Lisacek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Deep Learning Prediction of O-Glycopeptide Tandem Mass Spectra Enhances O-Glycoproteomics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniel BojarDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg 41390, Sweden.
Frederique LisacekProteome Informatics Group, Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, CH-1227 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0948-4537

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) methods have been and are now being increasingly integrated in prediction software implemented in bioinformatics and its glycoscience branch known as glycoinformatics. AI techniques have evolved in the past decades, and their applications in glycoscience are not yet widespread. This limited use is partly explained by the peculiarities of glyco-data that are notoriously hard to produce and analyze. Nonetheless, as time goes, the accumulation of glycomics, glycoproteomics, and glycan-binding data has reached a point where even the most recent deep learning methods can provide predictors with good performance. We discuss the historical development of the application of various AI methods in the broader field of glycoinformatics. A particular focus is placed on shining a light on challenges in glyco-data handling, contextualized by lessons learnt from related disciplines. Ending on the discussion of state-of-the-art deep learning approaches in glycoinformatics, we also envision the future of glycoinformatics, including development that need to occur in order to truly unleash the capabilities of glycoscience in the systems biology era.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceGlycomicsComputational BiologyPolysaccharidesSoftwarePolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID35961636
PMCPMC9615983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.