Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35961358›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet. Global health2022

Defining elimination as a public health problem for schistosomiasis control programmes: beyond prevalence of heavy-intensity infections.

Ryan E Wiegand, Fiona M Fleming, Sake J de Vlas, Maurice R Odiere, Safari Kinung'hi, Charles H King, Darin Evans, Michael D French, Susan P Montgomery, Anne Straily and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet. Global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Prevalence of humanEClinicalMedicine · 2024
    Article
  18. Parasites of the liver: A global problem?World journal of gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. The short-term impact ofProceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ryan E WiegandDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA; Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. Electronic address: rwiegand@cdc.gov.
Fiona M FlemingSCI Foundation, London, UK.
Sake J de VlasDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Maurice R OdiereNeglected Tropical Diseases Unit, Centre for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.
Safari Kinung'hiNational Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Charles H KingSchool of Medicine, Center for Global Health and Diseases, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Darin EvansUnited States Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA.
Michael D FrenchRTI International, Washington, DC, USA.
Susan P MontgomeryDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Anne StrailyDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jürg UtzingerSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Penelope VounatsouSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
W Evan SecorDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

WHO's 2021-30 road map for neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) outlines disease-specific and cross-cutting targets for the control, elimination, and eradication of NTDs in affected countries. For schistosomiasis, the criterion for elimination as a public health problem (EPHP) is defined as less than 1% prevalence of heavy-intensity infections (ie, ≥50 Schistosoma haematobium eggs per 10 mL of urine or ≥400 Schistosoma mansoni eggs per g of stool). However, we believe the evidence supporting this definition of EPHP is inadequate and the shifting distribution of schistosomiasis morbidity towards more subtle, rather than severe, morbidity in the face of large-scale control programmes requires guidelines to be adapted. In this Viewpoint, we outline the need for more accurate measures to develop a robust evidence-based monitoring and evaluation framework for schistosomiasis. Such a framework is crucial for achieving the goal of widespread EPHP of schistosomiasis and to meet the WHO road map targets. We encourage use of overall prevalence of schistosome infection (instead of the prevalence of heavy-intensity infections), development of species-dependent and age-dependent morbidity markers, and construction of a standardised monitoring and evaluation protocol.

Indexed as

Public HealthSchistosomiasisAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPrevalenceSchistosoma haematobium

Identifiers

PMID35961358
PMCPMC10184143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.