Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35961152›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry research2022

The conduct and oppositional defiant disorder scales (CODDS) for disruptive behaviour disorders.

Adrian Raine, Shichun Ling, Wesley Streicher, Jianghong Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adrian RaineDepartments of Criminology, Psychiatry, and Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, United States. Electronic address: araine@sas.upenn.edu.
Shichun LingSchool of Criminal Justice and Criminalistics, California State University, Los Angeles, United States.
Wesley StreicherDepartments of Criminology, Psychiatry, and Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, United States.
Jianghong LiuSchool of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, United States.

Funding

Omega-3 Supplementation and Adolescent BehaviorR01HD087485 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LIU, JIANGHONG, RAINE, ADRIAN · 2017 to 2021
$2.5M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD087485
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates the clinical validity of a five-minute instrument, the Conduct and Oppositional Defiant Disorder Scales (CODDS), for assessing oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) and conduct disorder (CD). Children (N = 428) aged 11-12 years and their caregiver were administered the NIMH DISC-IV (Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children), the CODDS, and validity measures. A second sample (N = 671) was utilized to develop a brief measure of limited prosocial emotions based on DSM 5. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves documented good sensitivity and specificity for CODDS scales in predicting DISC-IV clinical diagnoses of ODD (85%, 72% respectively) and CD (85%, 88%) diagnoses. Baseline CODDS provided added value over and above baseline clinical DISC- diagnoses in predicting future DISC ODD and CD diagnoses 12 months later, as well as in predicting social and school functioning. Study 2 further established psychometric properties of the CODDS, with brief measures of CODDS limited prosocial emotions (LPE) having a good fit to the hypothesized DSM 5 four-factor structure of LPE. Findings indicates that the CODDS has utility as a five-minute proxy for diagnoses of ODD and CD in clinical research and potentially practice where time and resources are limited.

Indexed as

Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior DisordersConduct DisorderChildDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersEmotionsHumansPsychometricsAggressionAntisocialCallous-unemotionalConduct disorderLimited prosocial emotionsOppositional defiant disorderPsychopathy

Identifiers

PMID35961152
PMCPMC10433509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.