Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35960913›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2022

Development and Validation of the PREMMplus Model for Multigene Hereditary Cancer Risk Assessment.

Matthew B Yurgelun, Hajime Uno, C Sloane Furniss, Chinedu Ukaegbu, Miki Horiguchi, Amal Yussuf, Holly LaDuca, Anu Chittenden, Judy E Garber, Sapna Syngal

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Who Should Have Multigene Germline Testing for Hereditary Cancer?Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew B YurgelunDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-6184-9273
Hajime UnoDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0003-0622-8471
C Sloane FurnissDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-5685-3788
Chinedu UkaegbuDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-1629-2824
Miki HoriguchiDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Amal YussufAmbry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-7876-2713
Holly LaDucaAmbry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-3745-9072
Anu ChittendenDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Judy E GarberDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0001-9449-3982
Sapna SyngalDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0001-5487-7471
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USAmbry Genetics (United States) · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Validation and extension of the PREMM Model for mismatch repair gene mutationsR01CA132829 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI SYNGAL, SAPNA · 2008 to 2022
$5.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA132829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWith the availability of multigene panel testing (MGPT) for hereditary cancer risk assessment, clinicians need to assess the likelihood of pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) across numerous genes in parallel. This study's aim was to develop and validate a clinical prediction model (PREMMplus) for MGPT risk assessment. MATERIALS AND

methodsPREMMplus was developed in a single-institution cohort of 7,280 individuals who had undergone MGPT. Logistic regression models with Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regularization were used to examine candidate predictors (age, sex, ethnicity, and personal/family history of 18 cancers/neoplasms) to estimate one's likelihood of carrying PGVs in 19 genes (broadly categorized by phenotypic overlap and/or relative penetrance: 11 category A [

resultsPREMMplus (score ≥ 2.5%) had 93.9%, 91.7%, and 89.3% sensitivity and 98.3%, 97.5%, and 97.8% negative-predictive value (NPV) for identifying category A gene PGV carriers in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. PREMMplus assessment (score ≥ 2.5%) had 89.9%, 85.6%, and 84.2% sensitivity and 95.0%, 93.5%, and 93.5% NPV, respectively, for identifying category A/B gene PGV carriers. Decision curve analyses support MGPT for individuals predicted to have ≥ 2.5% probability of a PGV.

conclusionPREMMplus accurately identifies individuals with PGVs in a diverse spectrum of cancer susceptibility genes with high sensitivity/NPV. Individuals with PREMMplus scores ≥ 2.5% should be considered for MGPT.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseNeoplasmsHumansModels, StatisticalPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID35960913
PMCPMC9746785
OpenAlexW4290948932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.