Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35960904›Full record

SynthesisJCO global oncology2022

Global Myeloma Trial Participation and Drug Access in the Era of Novel Therapies.

Raleigh Ayoolu Fatoki, Kelly Koehn, Amar Kelkar, Samer Al Hadidi, Nikita Mehra, Hira Mian, Ola Landgren, Dickran Kazandjian, James Hoffman, Douglas W Sborov and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JCO global oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Perioperative considerations for patients with multiple myeloma.European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Monoclonal Gammopathies in Africa.Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Raleigh Ayoolu FatokiInternal Medicine Department, Kaiser Permanente - Oakland Medical Center, Oakland, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-6401-0177
Kelly KoehnDivision of Hematological Malignancies and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS.
Amar KelkarDivision of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0001-7627-8509
Samer Al HadidiMyeloma Center, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR.ORCID 0000-0003-4297-8042
Nikita MehraDepartment of Medical Oncology and Molecular Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, India.
Hira MianDepartment of Oncology, Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre-Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1584-1067
Ola LandgrenMyeloma Program, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL.ORCID 0000-0001-6485-4839
Dickran KazandjianMyeloma Program, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL.ORCID 0000-0002-6593-0917
James HoffmanMyeloma Program, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL.
Douglas W SborovDivision of Hematology and Hematological Malignancies, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT.ORCID 0000-0003-4268-2698
Ghulam Rehman MohyuddinDivision of Hematology and Hematological Malignancies, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT.

Funding

Tumor Biology Research ProgramP30CA240139 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Daniel Bilbao · 2019 to 2026
$24.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA240139
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe globalization of clinical trials has accelerated recent advances in multiple myeloma (MM). However, it is unclear whether trial enrollment locations are reflective of the global burden of MM and whether access to novel therapies is timely and equitable for countries that participate in those trials.

methodsTo assess this, we characterized where MM trials that led to US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals were conducted and determined how often and quickly these drug regimens received approval in their participating trial countries on the basis of country income level and geographic region.

resultsA systematic review was conducted to identify all MM clinical trials that met their primary endpoint, enrolled patients outside the United States, and resulted in FDA approval from 2005 to 2019. A total of 18 pivotal MM clinical trials were identified. High-income countries enrolled patients in 100% (18/18) of the trials identified, whereas upper-middle and lower-middle-income countries were represented in 61% (11/18) and 28% (5/18) of trials, respectively. No patients from low-income countries were enrolled. One trial enrolled patients in sub-Saharan Africa, and no trials enrolled patients in South Asia/Caribbean. For drugs/regimens that were approved in their participating countries, the median time from FDA approval to approval was 10.9 months. There were no drugs approved in lower-middle-income trial countries. MM trials leading to FDA approval are generally run in high-income, European, and Central Asian countries.

conclusionThere are substantial disparities in where novel therapies are evaluated and where they are ultimately approved for use on the basis of income level and geography.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalMultiple MyelomaEthnicityHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID35960904
PMCPMC9470137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.