Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35960752›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Factors that influence uptake of routine postnatal care: Findings on women's perspectives from a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Emma Sacks, Kenneth Finlayson, Vanessa Brizuela, Nicola Crossland, Daniela Ziegler, Caroline Sauvé, Étienne V Langlois, Dena Javadi, Soo Downe, Mercedes Bonet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
19.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Barriers and enablers to postnatal care utilization in the Oshana region of Namibia: A qualitative study.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Maternal postnatal care in general practice: steps forward.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Emma SacksDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0743-7208
Kenneth FinlaysonSchool of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.
Vanessa BrizuelaDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Genève, Switzerland.
Nicola CrosslandSchool of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.
Daniela ZieglerCentre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Caroline SauvéCentre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7943-0297
Étienne V LangloisPartnership for Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health, World Health Organization, Genève, Switzerland.
Dena JavadiDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Soo DowneSchool of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.
Mercedes BonetDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Genève, Switzerland.
University of Lancashire · GBWorld Health Organization · CHCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAHarvard University · US

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective postnatal care is important for optimal care of women and newborns-to promote health and wellbeing, identify and treat clinical and psychosocial concerns, and to provide support for families. Yet uptake of formal postnatal care services is low and inequitable in many countries. As part of a larger study examining the views of women, partners, and families requiring both routine and specialised care, we analysed a subset of data on the views and experiences of women related to routine postnatal care.

methodsWe undertook a qualitative evidence synthesis, using a framework analysis approach. We included studies published up to December 2019 with extractable qualitative data, with no language restriction. We focused on women in the general population and their accounts of routine postnatal care utilization. We searched MEDLINE, PUBMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, EBM-Reviews, and grey literature. Two reviewers screened each study independently; inclusion was agreed by consensus. Data abstraction and scientific quality assessment were carried out using a study-specific extraction form and established quality assessment tools. The analysis framework was developed a priori based on previous knowledge and research on the topic and adapted. Due to the number of included texts, the final synthesis was developed inductively from the initial framework by iterative sampling of the included studies, until data saturation was achieved. Findings are presented by high versus low/middle income country, and by confidence in the finding, applying the GRADE-CERQual approach.

findingsOf 12,678 papers, 512 met the inclusion criteria; 59 articles were sampled for analysis. Five themes were identified: access and availability; physical and human resources; external influences; social norms; and experience of care. High confidence study findings included the perceived low value of postnatal care for healthy women and infants; concerns around access and quality of care; and women's desire for more emotional and psychosocial support during the postnatal period. These findings highlight multiple missed opportunities for postnatal care promotion and ensuring continuity of care.

conclusionsFactors that influence women's utilization of postnatal care are interlinked, and include access, quality, and social norms. Many women recognised the specific challenges of the postnatal period and emphasised the need for emotional and psychosocial support in this time, in addition to clinical care. While this is likely a universal need, studies on mental health needs have predominantly been conducted in high-income settings. Postnatal care programmes and related research should consider these multiple drivers and multi-faceted needs, and the holistic postpartum needs of women and their families should be studied in a wider range of settings. REGISTRATION: This protocol is registered in the PROSPERO database for systematic reviews: CRD42019139183.

Indexed as

Health PromotionPostnatal CareFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPostpartum PeriodPregnancyQualitative ResearchSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID35960752
PMCPMC9374256
OpenAlexW4290851352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.