Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35960635›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology2022

ECM roles and biomechanics in cardiac tissue decellularization.

Kaitlin M Whitehead, Hanifah K L Hendricks, Sirin N Cakir, Lisandra E de Castro Brás

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kaitlin M WhiteheadDepartment of Physiology, The Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina.
Hanifah K L HendricksDepartment of Physiology, The Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina.
Sirin N CakirDepartment of Physiology, The Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina.
Lisandra E de Castro BrásDepartment of Physiology, The Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-0190-8892
East Carolina University · US

Funding

Collagen-derived peptides to target inflammation in myocardial infarctionR01HL152297 · NHLBI · EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY · PI DE CASTRO BRAZ, LISANDRA E · 2022 to 2025
$1.5M
Collagen-derived peptides to target inflammation in myocardial infarctionR56HL152297 · NHLBI · EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY · PI DE CASTRO BRAZ, LISANDRA E · 2020 to 2020
$366k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL152297NHLBI NIH HHS R56 HL152297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural biomaterials hold enormous potential for tissue regeneration. The rapid advance of several tissue-engineered biomaterials, such as natural and synthetic polymer-based scaffolds, has led to widespread application of these materials in the clinic and in research. However, biomaterials can have limited repair capacity; obstacles result from immunogenicity, difficulties in mimicking native microenvironments, and maintaining the mechanical and biochemical (i.e., biomechanical) properties of native organs/tissues. The emergence of decellularized extracellular matrix (ECM)-derived biomaterials provides an attractive solution to overcome these hurdles since decellularized ECM provides a nonimmune environment with native three-dimensional structures and bioactive components. More importantly, decellularized ECM can be generated from the tissue of interest, such as the heart, and keep its native macro- and microstructure and tissue-specific composition. These decellularized cardiac matrices/scaffolds can then be reseeded using cardiac cells, and the resulting recellularized construct is considered an ideal choice for regenerating functional organs/tissues. Nonetheless, the decellularization process must be optimized and depends on tissue type, age, and functional goal. Although most decellularization protocols significantly reduce immunogenicity and deliver a matrix that maintains the tissue macrostructure, suboptimal decellularization can change ECM composition and microstructure, which affects the biomechanical properties of the tissue and consequently changes cell-matrix interactions and organ function. Herein, we review methods of decellularization, with particular emphasis on cardiac tissue, and how they can affect the biomechanics of the tissue, which in turn determines success of reseeding and in vivo viability. Moreover, we review recent developments in decellularized ECM-derived cardiac biomaterials and discuss future perspectives.

Indexed as

Extracellular MatrixTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsBiomechanical PhenomenaTissue EngineeringBiocompatible Materialsbiomechanicscardiacdecellularizationextracellular matrix

Identifiers

PMID35960635
PMCPMC9467473
OpenAlexW4290861654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.