Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35960516›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2022

Macular Layer Thickness and Effect of BMI, Body Fat, and Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors: The Tromsø Study.

Therese von Hanno, Live Lund Hareide, Lars Småbrekke, Bente Morseth, Monica Sneve, Maja Gran Erke, Ellisiv Bøgeberg Mathiesen, Geir Bertelsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The retinal ganglion cells in metabolic syndrome.Annals of translational medicine · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Therese von HannoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø, Norway.
Live Lund HareideFaculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Lars SmåbrekkeDepartment of Pharmacy, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Bente MorsethSchool of Sport Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Monica SneveHospital Administration, Bærum Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Bærum, Norway.
Maja Gran ErkeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ellisiv Bøgeberg MathiesenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Geir BertelsenDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
UiT The Arctic University of Norway · NONordland Hospital Trust · NONorwegian Directorate of Health · NOUniversity of Oslo · NOVestre Viken Hospital Trust · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate associations between cardiovascular risk factors and the thickness of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL), and outer retina layers (ORL). Methods: In this population-based study, we included participants from the Tromsø Study: Tromsø6 (2007 to 2008) and Tromsø7 (2015 to 2016). Persons with diabetes and/or diagnosed glaucoma were excluded from this study. Retinal thickness was measured on optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT) macula-scans, segmented on RNFL, GCIPL, and ORL and associations were analyzed cross-sectionally (N = 8288) and longitudinally (N = 2595). We used directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) for model selection, and linear regression to adjust for confounders and mediators in models assessing direct effects. Factors examined were age, sex, blood pressure, daily smoking, serum lipids, glycated hemoglobin, body mass index (BMI), total body fat percentage (BFP), and the adjustment variables refraction and height. Results: The explained variance of cardiovascular risk factors was highest in GCIPL (0.126). GCIPL had a strong negative association with age. Women had thicker GCIPL than men at higher age and thinner ORL at all ages (P < 0.001). Systolic blood pressure was negatively associated with RNFL/GCIPL (P = 0.001/0.004), with indication of a U-shaped relationship with GCIPL in women. The negative association with BMI was strongest in men, with significant effect for RNFL/GCIPL/ORL (P = 0.001/<0.001/0.019) and in women for GCIPL/ORL (P = 0.030/0.037). BFP was negatively associated with GCIPL (P = 0.01). Higher baseline BMI was associated with a reduction in GCIPL over 8 years (P = 0.03). Conclusions: Cardiovascular risk factors explained 12.6% of the variance in GCIPL, with weight and blood pressure the most important modifiable factors.

Indexed as

Macula LuteaNerve FibersAdipose TissueBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansIntraocular PressureMaleRetinal Ganglion CellsTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID35960516
PMCPMC9396695
OpenAlexW4290830442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.