Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35960358›Full record

ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2022

Use of digital health applications for the detection of atrial fibrillation.

Dennis Lawin, Sebastian Kuhn, Sophia Schulze Lammers, Thorsten Lawrenz, Christoph Stellbrink

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Impact of atrial fibrillation diagnosis-to-ablation time on 24-month efficacy and safety outcomes in the Cryo Global Registry.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Observational
  4. Review
  5. [Characterization of atrial fibrillation burden using wearables].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dennis LawinDepartment of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University hospital OWL of Bielefeld University, Campus Klinikum Bielefeld, Teutoburger Str. 50, 33604, Bielefeld, Germany. dennis.lawin@klinikumbielefeld.de.
Sebastian KuhnDepartment of Digital Medicine, Medical Faculty OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Sophia Schulze LammersDepartment of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University hospital OWL of Bielefeld University, Campus Klinikum Bielefeld, Teutoburger Str. 50, 33604, Bielefeld, Germany.
Thorsten LawrenzDepartment of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University hospital OWL of Bielefeld University, Campus Klinikum Bielefeld, Teutoburger Str. 50, 33604, Bielefeld, Germany.
Christoph StellbrinkDepartment of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University hospital OWL of Bielefeld University, Campus Klinikum Bielefeld, Teutoburger Str. 50, 33604, Bielefeld, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advances in health care technologies over the last decade have led to improved capabilities in the use of digital health applications (DiHA) for the detection of atrial fibrillation (AFib). Thus, home-based remote heart rhythm monitoring is facilitated by smartphones or smartwatches alone or combined with external sensors. The available products differ in terms of type of application (wearable vs. handheld) and the technique used for rhythm detection (electrocardiography [ECG] vs. photoplethysmography [PPG]). While ECG-based algorithms often require additional sensors, PPG utilizes techniques integrated in smartphones or smartwatches. Algorithms based on artificial intelligence allow for the automated diagnosis of AFib, enabling high diagnostic accuracy for both ECG-based and PPG-based DiHA. Advantages for clinical use result from the widespread accessibility of rhythm monitoring, thereby permitting earlier diagnosis and higher AFib detection rates. DiHA are also useful for the follow-up of patients with known AFib by monitoring the success of therapeutic interventions to restore sinus rhythm, e.g. catheter ablation. Although some studies strongly suggest a potential benefit for the use of DiHA in the setting of AFib, the overall evidence for an improvement in hard, clinical endpoints and positive effects on clinical care is scarce. To enhance the acceptance of DiHA use in daily practice, more studies evaluating their clinical benefits for the detection of AFib are required. Moreover, most of the applications are still not reimbursable, although the German Digital Health Care Act (Digitale-Versorgung-Gesetz, DVG) made reimbursement possible in principle in 2019.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationArtificial IntelligenceElectrocardiographyHumansPhotoplethysmographyAFibHeart rhythm monitoringRemote patient managementScreeningTelemedicine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.