Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35960344›Full record

Trial reportInternational orthopaedics2022

A prospective comparative study between percutaneous cannulated screws and Kirschner wires in treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures.

Hossam El-Azab, Khalaf Fathy Elsayed Ahmed, Abdelrahman Hafez Khalefa, Ashraf Rashad Marzouk

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. In Vitro Experimental Study of BiofiligreeBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hossam El-AzabOrthopaedics and Traumatology Department, Sohag Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt.
Khalaf Fathy Elsayed AhmedOrthopaedics and Traumatology Department, Sohag Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt. khalaffathy@med.sohag.edu.eg.
Abdelrahman Hafez KhalefaOrthopaedics and Traumatology Department, Sohag Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt.
Ashraf Rashad MarzoukOrthopaedics and Traumatology Department, Sohag Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt.
Sohag University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSeveral minimally invasive procedures were used to treat displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACFs). No agreement among different authors about either the ideal fixation method or which technique is minimally invasive. The aim of this study was to compare functional and radiographic outcomes of two minimally invasive techniques in treatment of Sanders type II and III DIACFs by using K-wires or cannulated screws without bone grafts.

methodsA prospective randomized controlled study was conducted on 28 patients (34 feet) with Sanders type II or III DIACFs, treated by closed reduction and fixation using cannulated screws or K-wires, at the Orthopedics Department of Sohag University Hospital, between April 2020 and February 2022. Functional assessment was done by American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and VAS for pain. Radiographic assessment was done by measurement of three calcaneal angles (Gissane, Böhler's, and posterior facet inclination angles) and three calcaneal distances (height, length, and width of the calcaneus).

resultsMean ages of patients at the time of operation were 34.8 years for the cannulated screw group and 36.6 years for the K-wire group. A vast majority of patients were males (78.6%). Involvement of the right side in the cannulated screw group was 57.1% and that in the K-wire group was 47.9%. Mean operative time was significantly shorter among the K-wire group (42 min) compared to the cannulated screw group (57 min). Mean AOFAS score was higher among the cannulated screw group (85.9 points) compared to the K-wire group (75.8 points). Final VAS was significantly better among the cannulated screw group compared to the K-wire group. Mean time of radiographic union in the cannulated screw group was 8.9 weeks and that in the K-wire group was 10.1 weeks.

conclusionBoth techniques avoided wound complications associated with ORIF with the advantage of a shorter hospital stay. Patients in the cannulated screw group had better functional and radiographic outcomes and a lower rate of subtalar arthritis than patients in the K-wire group. K-wires had advantages of reduced operative time, and easy removal as an outpatient procedure.

Indexed as

Ankle InjuriesCalcaneusFractures, BoneIntra-Articular FracturesKnee InjuriesAdultBone WiresFemaleFracture Fixation, InternalHumansMaleProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCannulated screwsIntra-articular calcaneal fracturesK-wiresMinimally invasive surgeryPercutaneous fixationProspective comparative study

Identifiers

PMID35960344
PMCPMC9556432
OpenAlexW4291163139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.