Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35960339›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

AI-assisted biparametric MRI surveillance of prostate cancer: feasibility study.

C Roest, T C Kwee, A Saha, J J Fütterer, D Yakar, H Huisman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Prostate MR Imaging: Technical Foundations, Clinical Applications, and Workflow Implications.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. PI-RADS: Where Next?Radiology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C RoestDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Kochstraat 250, 9728 KL, Groningen, the Netherlands. c.roest@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3575-4465
T C KweeDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Kochstraat 250, 9728 KL, Groningen, the Netherlands.
A SahaDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
J J FüttererDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
D YakarDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Kochstraat 250, 9728 KL, Groningen, the Netherlands.
H HuismanDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the feasibility of automatic longitudinal analysis of consecutive biparametric MRI (bpMRI) scans to detect clinically significant (cs) prostate cancer (PCa).

methodsThis retrospective study included a multi-center dataset of 1513 patients who underwent bpMRI (T2 + DWI) between 2014 and 2020, of whom 73 patients underwent at least two consecutive bpMRI scans and repeat biopsies. A deep learning PCa detection model was developed to produce a heatmap of all PIRADS ≥ 2 lesions across prior and current studies. The heatmaps for each patient's prior and current examination were used to extract differential volumetric and likelihood features reflecting explainable changes between examinations. A machine learning classifier was trained to predict from these features csPCa (ISUP > 1) at the current examination according to biopsy. A classifier trained on the current study only was developed for comparison. An extended classifier was developed to incorporate clinical parameters (PSA, PSA density, and age). The cross-validated diagnostic accuracies were compared using ROC analysis. The diagnostic performance of the best model was compared to the radiologist scores.

resultsThe model including prior and current study (AUC 0.81, CI: 0.69, 0.91) resulted in a higher (p = 0.04) diagnostic accuracy than the current only model (AUC 0.73, CI: 0.61, 0.84). Adding clinical variables further improved diagnostic performance (AUC 0.86, CI: 0.77, 0.93). The diagnostic performance of the surveillance AI model was significantly better (p = 0.02) than of radiologists (AUC 0.69, CI: 0.54, 0.81).

conclusionsOur proposed AI-assisted surveillance of prostate MRI can pick up explainable, diagnostically relevant changes with promising diagnostic accuracy. KEY POINTS: • Sequential prostate MRI scans can be automatically evaluated using a hybrid deep learning and machine learning approach. • The diagnostic accuracy of our csPCa detection AI model improved by including clinical parameters.

Indexed as

Prostate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsFeasibility StudiesHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRetrospective StudiesProstate-Specific AntigenDeep learningMagnetic resonance imagingProstatic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID35960339
PMCPMC9755080
OpenAlexW4291148158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.