ReviewDermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022
[New insights into the pathogenesis and molecular understanding of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas].
Review in Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pathogenesis of cutaneous T‑cell lymphomas (CTCL) is still an enigma. Therefore, extensive translational research efforts have been undertaken in recent years to gain further clinical and molecular insights. There is increasing evidence that the different clinical appearance of the CTCL subtypes derives from the assumption that they develop from different skin subpopulations of T cells. Detection and quantification of the malignant T‑cell clones is crucial for the diagnosis and prognosis of CTCL. Numerous recurrent mutant cellular signalling pathways have been found in recent years. This includes the JAK-STAT, NFκB, T‑cell receptor and MAP kinase signalling pathways, as well as cell cycle control and epigenetics. The most recent analyses imply a tumour evolution model with initial copy number variation, like amplification or deletions of specific DNA fragments (CNVs) and only subsequent later single nucleotide variations (SNVs). The crucial question, however, is which CNVs are sufficient to initiate general tumourigenesis? The challenge is to identify possible driver genes. Increasing molecular understanding in CTCL will include new breakthrough therapeutic options in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.