Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35960169›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

Information flows from hippocampus to auditory cortex during replay of verbal working memory items.

Vasileios Dimakopoulos, Pierre Mégevand, Lennart H Stieglitz, Lukas Imbach, Johannes Sarnthein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Is working memory domain-general or domain-specific?Trends in cognitive sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Theta-Alpha Connectivity in the Hippocampal-Entorhinal Circuit Predicts Working Memory Load.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vasileios DimakopoulosKlinik für Neurochirurgie, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Universität Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9490-565X
Pierre MégevandDépartement des neurosciences fondamentales, Faculté de médecine, Université de Genève, Genève, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0427-547X
Lennart H StieglitzKlinik für Neurochirurgie, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Universität Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Lukas ImbachSchweizerisches Epilepsie Zentrum, Klinik Lengg AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
Johannes SarntheinKlinik für Neurochirurgie, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Universität Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9141-381X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The maintenance of items in working memory (WM) relies on a widespread network of cortical areas and hippocampus where synchronization between electrophysiological recordings reflects functional coupling. We investigated the direction of information flow between auditory cortex and hippocampus while participants heard and then mentally replayed strings of letters in WM by activating their phonological loop. We recorded local field potentials from the hippocampus, reconstructed beamforming sources of scalp EEG

Indexed as

Auditory CortexElectroencephalographyHippocampusHumansMemory, Short-Termauditory cortexcomputational biologyGranger causalityhumanneurosciencephase-locking valuesystems biologytheta rhythm

Identifiers

PMID35960169
PMCPMC9374435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.