Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35960166›Full record

Trial reportBrain : a journal of neurology2022

Self-modulation of motor cortex activity after stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

Zeena-Britt Sanders, Melanie K Fleming, Tom Smejka, Marilien C Marzolla, Catharina Zich, Sebastian W Rieger, Michael Lührs, Rainer Goebel, Cassandra Sampaio-Baptista, Heidi Johansen-Berg

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03775915 naterminatednot on this map

The Use of Real-Time fMRI and a Mobile EEG System to Provide Neurofeedback to Stroke Patients to Promote Neural Plasticity for Motor Rehabilitation.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2018 to 2020Enrolled27ConditionsStrokeArmsNeurofeedback, Sham Neurofeedback
NCT06409754 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Application of Functional Electrical Stimulation Therapy Coupled to a P300-based Brain-Computer Interface for Paretic Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto Nacional de RehabilitacionRan2024 to 2026Enrolled26ConditionsStroke, Upper Extremity Paresis, Neuronal PlasticityArmsFunctional Electrical Stimulation Therapy coupled to a P-300 based Brain-Computer Interface, Conventional Physical Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Psilocybin-assisted neurofeedback for the improvement of executive functions: a randomized semi-naturalistic-lab feasibility study.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zeena-Britt SandersWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7417-1855
Melanie K FlemingWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Tom SmejkaWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Marilien C MarzollaWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Catharina ZichWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Sebastian W RiegerWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Michael LührsDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, 6229 EV Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Rainer GoebelDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, 6229 EV Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Cassandra Sampaio-BaptistaWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Heidi Johansen-BergWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
University of Oxford · GBMaastricht University · NL

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-time functional MRI neurofeedback allows individuals to self-modulate their ongoing brain activity. This may be a useful tool in clinical disorders that are associated with altered brain activity patterns. Motor impairment after stroke has previously been associated with decreased laterality of motor cortex activity. Here we examined whether chronic stroke survivors were able to use real-time fMRI neurofeedback to increase laterality of motor cortex activity and assessed effects on motor performance and on brain structure and function. We carried out a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03775915) in which 24 chronic stroke survivors with mild to moderate upper limb impairment experienced three training days of either Real (n = 12) or Sham (n = 12) neurofeedback. Assessments of brain structure, brain function and measures of upper-limb function were carried out before and 1 week after neurofeedback training. Additionally, measures of upper-limb function were repeated 1 month after neurofeedback training. Primary outcome measures were (i) changes in lateralization of motor cortex activity during movements of the stroke-affected hand throughout neurofeedback training days; and (ii) changes in motor performance of the affected limb on the Jebsen Taylor Test (JTT). Stroke survivors were able to use Real neurofeedback to increase laterality of motor cortex activity within (P = 0.019), but not across, training days. There was no group effect on the primary behavioural outcome measure, which was average JTT performance across all subtasks (P = 0.116). Secondary analysis found improvements in the performance of the gross motor subtasks of the JTT in the Real neurofeedback group compared to Sham (P = 0.010). However, there were no improvements on the Action Research Arm Test or the Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer score (both P > 0.5). Additionally, decreased white-matter asymmetry of the corticospinal tracts was detected 1 week after neurofeedback training (P = 0.008), indicating that the tracts become more similar with Real neurofeedback. Changes in the affected corticospinal tract were positively correlated with participants neurofeedback performance (P = 0.002). Therefore, here we demonstrate that chronic stroke survivors are able to use functional MRI neurofeedback to self-modulate motor cortex activity in comparison to a Sham control, and that training is associated with improvements in gross hand motor performance and with white matter structural changes.

Indexed as

Motor CortexStrokeStroke RehabilitationHumansRecovery of FunctionUpper Extremitymotor cortexneurofeedbackreal-time fMRIstrokewhite matter

Identifiers

PMID35960166
PMCPMC9586541
OpenAlexW4290975454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.