Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35960155›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2022

One Clinician Is All You Need-Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurement Extraction: Deep Learning Algorithm Development.

Pulkit Singh, Julian Haimovich, Christopher Reeder, Shaan Khurshid, Emily S Lau, Jonathan W Cunningham, Anthony Philippakis, Christopher D Anderson, Jennifer E Ho, Steven A Lubitz and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pulkit SinghData Sciences Platform, The Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1538-5519
Julian HaimovichDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4346-6241
Christopher ReederData Sciences Platform, The Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3893-2423
Shaan KhurshidDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2840-4539
Emily S LauCardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9361-6397
Jonathan W CunninghamCardiovascular Disease Initiative, The Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4481-7867
Anthony PhilippakisData Sciences Platform, The Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6953-3794
Christopher D AndersonDepartment of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0053-2002
Jennifer E HoCardiovascular Disease Initiative, The Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7987-4768
Steven A LubitzDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9599-4866
Puneet BatraData Sciences Platform, The Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6822-0593
Broad Institute · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Noninvasive Cardiovascular Imaging Research Training ProgramT32HL094301 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Marcelo F DI CARLI · 2010 to 2026
$7.8M
Genomics of Cardiac ArrhythmiasR01HL139731 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ELLINOR, PATRICK THOMAS · 2018 to 2022
$3.3M
Using Electrocardiogram Genetics to Inform Arrhythmia RiskR01HL157635 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ELLINOR, PATRICK THOMAS, MIRSHAHI, TOORAJ · 2022 to 2025
$2.9M
HFpEF Susceptibility in Women: The Role of InflammationK23HL159243 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Emily Lau · 2022 to 2026
$1.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL159243NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL139731NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL157635NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL094301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is a powerful diagnostic modality that provides detailed quantitative assessment of cardiac anatomy and function. Automated extraction of CMR measurements from clinical reports that are typically stored as unstructured text in electronic health record systems would facilitate their use in research. Existing machine learning approaches either rely on large quantities of expert annotation or require the development of engineered rules that are time-consuming and are specific to the setting in which they were developed.

objectiveWe hypothesize that the use of pretrained transformer-based language models may enable label-efficient numerical extraction from clinical text without the need for heuristics or large quantities of expert annotations. Here, we fine-tuned pretrained transformer-based language models on a small quantity of CMR annotations to extract 21 CMR measurements. We assessed the effect of clinical pretraining to reduce labeling needs and explored alternative representations of numerical inputs to improve performance.

methodsOur study sample comprised 99,252 patients that received longitudinal cardiology care in a multi-institutional health care system. There were 12,720 available CMR reports from 9280 patients. We adapted PRAnCER (Platform Enabling Rapid Annotation for Clinical Entity Recognition), an annotation tool for clinical text, to collect annotations from a study clinician on 370 reports. We experimented with 5 different representations of numerical quantities and several model weight initializations. We evaluated extraction performance using macroaveraged F

resultsAll combinations of weight initializations and numerical representations obtained excellent performance on the gold-standard test set, suggesting that transformer models fine-tuned on a small set of annotations can effectively extract numerical quantities. Our results further indicate that custom numerical representations did not appear to have a significant impact on extraction performance. The best-performing model achieved a macroaveraged F

conclusionsThis study demonstrated that a domain-agnostic pretrained transformer model is able to effectively extract quantitative clinical measurements from diagnostic reports with a relatively small number of gold-standard annotations. The proposed workflow may serve as a roadmap for other quantitative entity extraction.

Indexed as

cardiac MRIclinical outcomesdeep learningmachine learningnatural language processingtransformers

Identifiers

PMID35960155
PMCPMC9526125
OpenAlexW4290975873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.