Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35959863›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of oral sciences2022

Effect of dentine site on resin and cement adaptation tested using X-ray and electron microscopy to evaluate bond durability and adhesive interfaces.

Arosha Tania Weerakoon, Crystal Cooper, Kamil Andrzej Sokolowski, Ian Arthur Meyers, David Thomson, Pauline Jane Ford, Christopher Sexton, Anne Louise Symons

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of oral sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Effect of Dentin Contamination with Hemostatic Agents and Cleaning Techniques on Bonding with Self-Adhesive Resin Cement.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Arosha Tania WeerakoonSchool of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9502-3410
Crystal CooperInstitute for Future Environments, Central Analytical Research Facility, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5247-1168
Kamil Andrzej SokolowskiThe Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3679-2321
Ian Arthur MeyersSchool of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1709-7940
David ThomsonSchool of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2102-1391
Pauline Jane FordSchool of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0901-2863
Christopher SextonSchool of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0826-804X
Anne Louise SymonsSchool of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6839-4577

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glass ionomer (GI) cements and self-etch (SE) or universal adhesives after etching (ER) adapt variably with dentine. Dentine characteristics vary with depth (deep/shallow), location (central/peripheral), and microscopic site (intertubular/peritubular). To directly compare adhesion to dentine, non-destructive imaging and testing are required. Here, GI, ER, and SE adapted at different dentine depths, locations, and sites were investigated using micro-CT, xenon plasma focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (Xe PFIB-SEM), and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). Extracted molars were prepared to deep or shallow slices and treated with the three adhesives. Micro-CT was used to compare changes to air volume gaps, following thermocycling, and statistically analysed using a quantile regression model and Fisher's exact test. The three adhesives performed similarly across dentine depths and locations, yet no change or overall increases and decreases in gaps at all dentine depths and locations were measured. The Xe PFIB-SEM-milled dentine-adhesive interfaces facilitated high-resolution characterization, and element profiling revealed variations across the tooth-material interfaces. Dentine depth and location had no impact on adhesive durability, although microscopic differences were observed. Here we demonstrate how micro-CT and Xe PFIB-SEM can be used to compare variable dental materials without complex multi-stage specimen preparation to minimize artefacts.

Indexed as

Dental BondingDentin-Bonding AgentsDental CementsDental MaterialsDentinGlass Ionomer CementsMaterials TestingMicroscopy, ElectronMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningResin CementsSurface PropertiesXenonX-RaysDental CementsDental MaterialsDentin-Bonding AgentsGlass Ionomer CementsResin CementsXenonfocused ion beamhumansin vitro techniquesmaterials testingsurface properties

Identifiers

PMID35959863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.