ArticleeLife2022
Learning to predict target location with turbulent odor plumes.
Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Fly navigational responses exploit plume-specific odor motion and gradient cues.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Article
- Perception and neural representation of intermittent odor stimuli in mice.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Advances and Prospects in Odour-based Management of Filth Flies.Journal of chemical ecology · 2026Review
- Sparse input representations explain odor discrimination in complex, concentration-varying mixtures.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Noise enhances odor source localization.ArXiv · 2026Article
- Article
- Amplification of Olfactory Transduction Currents Implements Sparse Stimulus Encoding.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Article
- Amplification of olfactory transduction currents implements sparse stimulus encoding.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Odour source distance is predictable from a time history of odour statistics for large scale outdoor plumes.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024Article
- The spiking output of the mouse olfactory bulb encodes large-scale temporal features of natural odor environments.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Odor representations from the two nostrils are temporally segregated in human piriform cortex.Current biology : CB · 2023Article
- Extracting spatial information from temporal odor patterns: insights from insects.Current opinion in insect science · 2023Review
- Olfactory search with finite-state controllers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Temporal novelty detection and multiple timescale integration drive Drosophila orientation dynamics in temporally diverse olfactory environments.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Animal behavior and neural recordings show that the brain is able to measure both the intensity and the timing of odor encounters. However, whether intensity or timing of odor detections is more informative for olfactory-driven behavior is not understood. To tackle this question, we consider the problem of locating a target using the odor it releases. We ask whether the position of a target is best predicted by measures of timing
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.