ArticleThe clinical respiratory journal2022
Is conventional transbronchial lung biopsy out: The evaluation of clinical value in diffuse parenchymal lung disease.
Article in The clinical respiratory journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictors of Severe Coughing and Its Impact on Bronchoalveolar Lavage and Transbronchial Lung Biopsy in Patients with Diffuse Lung Disease: Evaluation of Bronchoscopy Safety.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Is conventional transbronchial lung biopsy out: The evaluation of clinical value in diffuse parenchymal lung disease.The clinical respiratory journal · 2022Article
- Pilot study of archimedes virtual bronchoscopic navigation system-guided biopsy to diagnose lung nodules in children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Optimizing diagnostic yield in pulmonary lesions: impact of combined sampling tools and EBUS-TBNA during radial EBUS.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTransbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) is a relatively safe technique routinely employed by pulmonologists for the diagnosis of diffuse parenchymal lung disease (DPLD). Cryobiopsy is associated with higher diagnostic yield and a favorable risk/benefit ratio. Nevertheless, TBLB remains the representative method for definite diagnosis in developing countries.
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate whether the results obtained from TBLB had clinical value to pulmonologists in the management of DPLD.
methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent conventional TBLB for the diagnosis of DPLD from May 1, 2017, to April 30, 2019, at the Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University. The clinical value of TBLB was defined as leading to a specific histopathological diagnosis or being consistent with the clinical and radiological data.
resultsSeven hundred and forty-three patients with suspected DPLD were recruited. Conventional TBLB was considered clinically valuable in 439 procedures (59.1%), including 360 cases provided with definitive histopathological diagnoses, and 79 cases that were consistent with the working diagnoses. Among the 439 cases of clinically valuable TBLBs, 88 (20.0%), 37, 77 (10.7%), and 61 (13.9%) cases were diagnosed as connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease, definite histopathological diagnoses, malignancies, and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, respectively.
conclusionsConventional TBLB served as a key determinant or provided supplementary information in the final diagnosis of non-infectious DPLDs. TBLB decision-making should therefore be based on clinical and radiological data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.