Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35959561›Full record

ReviewJournal of materials chemistry. B2022

Fluidic enabled bioelectronic implants: opportunities and challenges.

Lawrence Coles, Pelumi W Oluwasanya, Nuzli Karam, Christopher M Proctor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of materials chemistry. B, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lawrence ColesElectrical Engineering Division, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. cmp81@cam.ac.uk.
Pelumi W OluwasanyaElectrical Engineering Division, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. cmp81@cam.ac.uk.
Nuzli KaramElectrical Engineering Division, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. cmp81@cam.ac.uk.
Christopher M ProctorElectrical Engineering Division, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. cmp81@cam.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T009314/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioelectronic implants are increasingly facilitating novel strategies for clinical diagnosis and treatment. The integration of fluidic technologies into such implants enables new complementary routes for sensing and therapy alongside electrical interaction. Indeed, these two technologies, electrical and fluidic, can work synergistically in a bioelectronics implant towards the fabrication of a complete therapeutic platform. In this perspective article, the leading applications of fluidic enabled bioelectronic implants are highlighted and methods of operation and material choices are discussed. Furthermore, a forward-looking perspective is offered on emerging opportunities as well as critical materials and technological challenges.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesBody FluidsProstheses and Implants

Identifiers

PMID35959561
PMCPMC9518646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.