Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35959559›Full record

SynthesisPsychological medicine2022

Telehealth

Anna Mae Scott, Justin Clark, Hannah Greenwood, Natalia Krzyzaniak, Magnolia Cardona, Ruwani Peiris, Rebecca Sims, Paul Glasziou

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychological medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Utilization of mental health services during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic - a systematic review and meta-analysis.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Evaluation of the internet-based intervention "Selfapy" in participants with unipolar depression and the impact on quality of life: a randomized, parallel group study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Trial
  12. The Impact of Federally Funded Home Visiting Programs on Parental Mental Health: a Systematic Review.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anna Mae ScottInstitute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0109-9001
Justin ClarkInstitute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Hannah GreenwoodInstitute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Natalia KrzyzaniakInstitute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Magnolia CardonaInstitute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Ruwani PeirisInstitute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Rebecca SimsInstitute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Paul GlasziouInstitute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring continuity of care for patients with major depressive disorders poses multiple challenges. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing real-time telehealth to face-to-face therapy for individuals with depression. We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central (to November 2020), conducted a citation analysis (January 2021), and searched clinical trial registries (March 2021). We included randomised controlled trials comparing similar or identical care, delivered via real-time telehealth (phone, video) to face-to-face. Outcomes included: depression severity, quality of life, therapeutic alliance, and care satisfaction. Where data were sufficient, mean differences were calculated. Nine trials (1268 patients) were included. There were no differences between telehealth and face-to-face care for depression severity at post-treatment (SMD -0.04, 95% CI -0.21 to 0.13,

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderTelemedicineDepressionHumansQuality of LifeDepressionmeta-analysissystematic reviewtelehealthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35959559
PMCPMC9693715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.