Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35959477›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

Skimming for barcodes: rapid production of mitochondrial genome and nuclear ribosomal repeat reference markers through shallow shotgun sequencing.

Mykle L Hoban, Jonathan Whitney, Allen G Collins, Christopher Meyer, Katherine R Murphy, Abigail J Reft, Katherine E Bemis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ecology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Analysis of the Entire Mitogenome of the Threatened Freshwater StingrayInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Mitogenomic Characterization and Phylogenetic Placement of African Hind,International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mykle L HobanHawai'i Institute of Marine Biology, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Kāne'ohe, Hawai'i, United States of America.
Jonathan WhitneyPacific Islands Fisheries Science Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Honolulu, Hawai'i, United States of America.
Allen G CollinsNOAA National Systematics Laboratory, Natural Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., United States of America.
Christopher MeyerDepartment of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., United States of America.
Katherine R MurphyLaboratories of Analytical Biology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., United States of America.
Abigail J ReftNOAA National Systematics Laboratory, Natural Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., United States of America.
Katherine E BemisNOAA National Systematics Laboratory, Natural Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA barcoding is critical to conservation and biodiversity research, yet public reference databases are incomplete. Existing barcode databases are biased toward cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) and frequently lack associated voucher specimens or geospatial metadata, which can hinder reliable species assignments. The emergence of metabarcoding approaches such as environmental DNA (eDNA) has necessitated multiple marker techniques combined with barcode reference databases backed by voucher specimens. Reference barcodes have traditionally been generated by Sanger sequencing, however sequencing multiple markers is costly for large numbers of specimens, requires multiple separate PCR reactions, and limits resulting sequences to targeted regions. High-throughput sequencing techniques such as genome skimming enable assembly of complete mitogenomes, which contain the most commonly used barcoding loci (

Indexed as

Genome, MitochondrialAnimalsBiodiversityDNADNA Barcoding, TaxonomicFishesDNACollectionsDNA barcodingFishesGenome skimmingMetabarcodingMitochondrial genomesMuseum

Identifiers

PMID35959477
PMCPMC9359134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.