ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022
Multi-person feature fusion transfer learning-based convolutional neural network for SSVEP-based collaborative BCI.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Signal Stacking to Dynamic Coupling: A Critical Review of Wearable EEG-EMG Fusion Brain-Computer Interfaces for Stroke Rehabilitation.Micromachines · 2026Review
- An Analysis of Deep Learning Models in SSVEP-Based BCI: A Survey.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- Single-trial P300 classification algorithm based on centralized multi-person data fusion CNN.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The conventional single-person brain-computer interface (BCI) systems have some intrinsic deficiencies such as low signal-to-noise ratio, distinct individual differences, and volatile experimental effect. To solve these problems, a centralized steady-state visually evoked potential collaborative BCI system (SSVEP-cBCI), which characterizes multi-person electroencephalography (EEG) feature fusion was constructed in this paper. Furthermore, three different feature fusion methods compatible with this new system were developed and applied to EEG classification, and a comparative analysis of their classification accuracy was performed with transfer learning-based convolutional neural network (TL-CNN) approach. Approach: An EEG-based SSVEP-cBCI system was set up to merge different individuals' EEG features stimulated by the instructions for the same task, and three feature fusion methods were adopted, namely parallel connection, serial connection, and multi-person averaging. The fused features were then input into CNN for classification. Additionally, transfer learning (TL) was applied first to a Tsinghua University (THU) benchmark dataset, and then to a collected dataset, so as to meet the CNN training requirement with a much smaller size of collected dataset and increase the classification accuracy. Ten subjects were recruited for data collection, and both datasets were used to gauge the three fusion algorithms' performance. Main results: The results predicted by TL-CNN approach in single-person mode and in multi-person mode with the three feature fusion methods were compared. The experimental results show that each multi-person mode is superior to single-person mode. Within the 3 s time window, the classification accuracy of the single-person CNN is only 90.6%, while the same measure of the two-person parallel connection fusion method can reach 96.6%, achieving better classification effect. Significance: The results show that the three multi-person feature fusion methods and the deep learning classification algorithm based on TL-CNN can effectively improve the SSVEP-cBCI classification performance. The feature fusion method of multi -person parallel feature connection achieves better classification results. Different feature fusion methods can be selected in different application scenarios to further optimize cBCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.