ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022
Two-step clustering-based pipeline for big dynamic functional network connectivity data.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamic Brain Age Modeling Identifies Network-Specific Cognitive Deficits in Schizophrenia.Research square · 2025Article
- Functional Brain Age Acceleration from Dynamic and Static Connectivity Predicts Working Memory and Attention Deficits in Schizophrenia.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Functional brain network dynamics of brooding in depression: Insights from real-time fMRI neurofeedback.Journal of affective disorders · 2025Article
- Development of a machine learning-based predictive model for maxillary sinus cysts and exploration of clustering patterns.Head & face medicine · 2025Article
- Functional brain network dynamics of brooding in depression: insights from real-time fMRI neurofeedback.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Increased functional connectivity between default mode network and visual network potentially correlates with duration of residual dizziness in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Explainable fuzzy clustering framework reveals divergent default mode network connectivity dynamics in schizophrenia.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Pairing explainable deep learning classification with clustering to uncover effects of schizophrenia upon whole brain functional network connectivity dynamics.Neuroimage. Reports · 2023Article
- Explainable Fuzzy Clustering Framework Reveals Divergent Default Mode Network Connectivity Dynamics in Schizophrenia.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dynamic functional network connectivity (dFNC) estimated from resting-state functional magnetic imaging (rs-fMRI) studies the temporally varying functional integration between brain networks. In a conventional dFNC pipeline, a clustering stage to summarize the connectivity patterns that are transiently but reliably realized over the course of a scanning session. However, identifying the right number of clusters (or states) through a conventional clustering criterion computed by running the algorithm repeatedly over a large range of cluster numbers is time-consuming and requires substantial computational power even for typical dFNC datasets, and the computational demands become prohibitive as datasets become larger and scans longer. Here we developed a new dFNC pipeline based on a two-step clustering approach to analyze large dFNC data without having access to huge computational power. Methods: In the proposed dFNC pipeline, we implement two-step clustering. In the first step, we randomly use a sub-sample dFNC data and identify several sets of states at different model orders. In the second step, we aggregate all dFNC states estimated from all iterations in the first step and use this to identify the optimum number of clusters using the elbow criteria. Additionally, we use this new reduced dataset and estimate a final set of states by performing a second kmeans clustering on the aggregated dFNC states from the first k-means clustering. To validate the reproducibility of results in the new pipeline, we analyzed four dFNC datasets from the human connectome project (HCP). Results: We found that both conventional and proposed dFNC pipelines generate similar brain dFNC states across all four sessions with more than 99% similarity. We found that the conventional dFNC pipeline evaluates the clustering order and finds the final dFNC state in 275 min, while this process takes only 11 min for the proposed dFNC pipeline. In other words, the new pipeline is 25 times faster than the traditional method in finding the optimum number of clusters and finding the final dFNC states. We also found that the new method results in better clustering quality than the conventional approach ( Conclusion: We developed a new analytic pipeline that facilitates the analysis of large dFNC datasets without having access to a huge computational power source. We validated the reproducibility of the result across multiple datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.