Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35958842›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Health care provider's experience and perspective of cervical cancer screening in Singapore: A qualitative study.

Brandon Wen Bing Chua, Pearlyn Neo, Viva Yan Ma, Li Min Lim, Joseph Soon Yau Ng, Hwee Lin Wee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brandon Wen Bing ChuaSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Pearlyn NeoSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Viva Yan MaStrategic Access, Public Affairs, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Singapore, Singapore.
Li Min LimDivision of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Joseph Soon Yau NgDivision of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Hwee Lin WeeSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
National University of Singapore · SGNational University Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In Singapore, the current cervical cancer screening (CCS) coverage rate of 48% falls below the national target of 70%. Health care providers (HCPs) play a critical role in promoting CCS uptake. However, there is limited understanding of the perspectives of HCPs regarding CCS. Hence, we aimed to understand the challenges encountered by HCPs delivering CCS in different care settings in the Singapore health system. We also aimed to explore perspectives on newer features of CCS such as self-sampling and HPV genotyping. Methods: Physicians, nurses, program administrators and laboratory technicians involved with CCS were invited for a one-on-one semi-structured interview conducted over Zoom between May to August 2021. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Eighteen HCPs from 12 institutions were interviewed. Most participants were women (61.1%) and worked in public health institutions (72.2%). For factors influencing CCS, nine key themes were identified and organized into four categories: (1) patient factors, (2) HCP factors, (3) health system factors and (4) health promotion factors. Key themes commonly highlighted by study participants were related to patients' preferences and acceptance for screening, the processes of delivering CCS, the national priority for cervical cancer and the effectiveness of existing health promotion efforts. Five key themes were identified for CCS innovations. Self-sampling was viewed favorably to increase CCS uptake, while primary HPV screening with HPV partial genotyping had higher sensitivities to detect pre-cancers and cancers compared to cytology. Extended HPV genotyping beyond HPV16/18 could play an important role in CCS with increasing HPV vaccination coverage, as well as in the management of persistent HPV infection. Conclusion: In Singapore, HCPs face multiple challenges for CCS in practice. Insights from this study are directly relevant to, and useful for developing policies around national CCS programs and treatment guidelines.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth PersonnelHuman papillomavirus 16Human papillomavirus 18HumansMaleSingaporecervical cancer screeninghealth care providersHPV extended genotypingself-samplingSingapore

Identifiers

PMID35958842
PMCPMC9360748
OpenAlexW4287921836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.