ArticleEuropean journal for philosophy of science2022
Public engagement and argumentation in science.
Article in European journal for philosophy of science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The new Flemings now sing: a methodological evaluation of gamification and citizen science strategies to raise awareness on antimicrobial resistance.Immunology and cell biology · 2026Article
- The mutualistic symbiosis of public and scientific attention in science communication.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cultivating awareness: How botanical gardens can foster public engagement with plant pathogens.PLoS pathogens · 2025Review
- Perception and argumentation in the LK-99 superconductivity controversy: a sentiment and argument mining analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Critical Contextual Empiricism for Busy People: Scientific Argumentation as Epistemic Exchange.Topoi : an international review of philosophy · 2025Article
- Explaining barriers to childbearing using the risk communication and community engagement (RCCE) strategy: Based on action research.Health science reports · 2023Article
- Does patient and public involvement impact public health decision-making? A 10 year retrospective analysis of public consultation in Brazil.Health research policy and systems · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Public engagement is one of the fundamental pillars of the European programme for research and innovation
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.