ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Data Analysis of Educational Evaluation Using K-Means Clustering Method.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clusters and their social determinants associated with vaccination against human papillomavirus in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil.Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Interpersonal Process of Care Experience of Patients Receiving Care at a Chiropractic Outpatient Teaching Clinic.Journal of chiropractic medicine · 2025Article
- RETRACTED: Evaluation of influencing factors of China university teaching quality based on fuzzy logic and deep learning technology.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is thought to be an effective technique to handle the problem of educational data explosion and lack of information by identifying potential relationships between data and directing decision-makers through the extraction, transformation, analysis, and modeling of educational data. Based on this, this research constructs a data analysis model for education evaluation using the K-means clustering technique in DM. The weight of each index of students' comprehensive quality is calculated using AHP, and the value of the weight is used to determine whether the index is the important feature of analysis system mining. Improved sampling technology is used to deal with the representation of large-scale data sets; a sample partition clustering technique is proposed as a general framework. The best accuracy of this method, according to experimental data, is 95.6 percent, which is 12.1 percent greater than Mi cluster algorithm and 6.8 percent higher than DRCluster algorithm. The K-means clustering analysis technology is used to analyze students' comprehensive evaluation data in this paper, with the goal of determining the regularity of data implication, accurately diagnosing learning problems, and providing the foundation for developing effective student management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.