ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Value of Artificial Neural Network Ultrasound in Improving Breast Cancer Diagnosis.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retracted: Value of Artificial Neural Network Ultrasound in Improving Breast Cancer Diagnosis.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2023Article
- Breast Cancer Subtype Prediction Model Employing Artificial Neural Network andJournal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-07-19Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Paper Mill · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/5832883057C793393D529C9C6F8B59
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultrasound-guided needle biopsy based on artificial neural network, as a safe, effective, and simple preoperative pathological diagnosis technique, has been widely used in clinical practice. Ultrasound-guided needle biopsy based on artificial neural networks for suspicious breast lesions found in conventional ultrasound examinations is an effective method for preoperative diagnosis. The purpose of this article is to study the value of artificial neural network ultrasound in improving breast cancer diagnosis. This article summarizes the neuron model of PCNN by observing and studying its impulse synchronization phenomenon. Aiming at gray-scale images disturbed by mixed noise (impulse noise and the Gaussian noise), a comprehensive filtering algorithm based on the simplified PCNN model is proposed. In this paper, the benign and malignant breast masses were evaluated based on the two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound imaging signs of the mass, and compared with the postoperative pathological results, a logistic regression model was established to analyze the shape, boundary, microcalcification, and posterior echo attenuation of the mass, values for keratinization or burrs, convergent signs, and blood flow classification in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant. In this paper, a color ultrasound diagnostic device is used, Sonobi is used as a contrast medium, and the injection volume is 2.4 ml/dose. During the imaging process, the sound image performance of the lesion is dynamically observed, the original dynamic data are stored throughout the whole process, and the playback analysis is performed after the imaging is completed. Studies have shown that CDUS elastography (UE) combined with MRI can increase the sensitivity of breast cancer diagnosis, with a diagnostic accuracy rate of 92.4%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.