ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2022
Accuracy of a markerless motion capture system in estimating upper extremity kinematics during boxing.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validation of Pose Estimation Models for Automated Kickboxing Technique Analysis Using 2TRAX3.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- IMU- and Vision-Based Measurement Techniques for Joint Kinematics: A Narrative Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Evaluating a Multi-Camera Markerless System for Capturing Basketball-Specific Movements: An Exploration Using 25 Hz Video Streams.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Indicator analysis of the footwork in the world's top badminton athletes based on markerless motion measurement.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Image-Analysis-Based Validation of the Mathematical Framework for the Representation of the Travel of an Accelerometer-Based Texture Testing Device.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Benchmarking raw datasets and collaboratively-evolving processed data for markerless motion capture analysis.Data in brief · 2025Article
- Challenges in Combining EMG, Joint Moments, and GRF from Marker-Less Video-Based Motion Capture Systems.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Influence of the Camera Viewing Angle on OpenPose Validity in Motion Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- DeepLabCut custom-trained model and the refinement function for gait analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Biomechanical assessment of upright birthing positions using marker-based and markerless motion capture systems.PloS one · 2025Article
- Reliability of artificial intelligence-driven markerless motion capture in gait analyses of healthy adults.PloS one · 2025Article
- Concurrent validity and test reliability of the deep learning markerless motion capture system during the overhead squat.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Proficiency Barrier in Track and Field: Adaptation and Generalization Processes.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Assessment of the Accuracy of a Deep Learning Algorithm- and Video-based Motion Capture System in Estimating Snatch Kinematics.International journal of exercise science · 2024Article
- Quantitative Comparison of Hand Kinematics Measured with a Markerless Commercial Head-Mounted Display and a Marker-Based Motion Capture System in Stroke Survivors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Kinematic analysis of the upper extremity can be useful to assess the performance and skill levels of athletes during combat sports such as boxing. Although marker-based approach is widely used to obtain kinematic data, it is not suitable for "in the field" activities, i.e., when performed outside the laboratory environment. Markerless video-based systems along with deep learning-based pose estimation algorithms show great potential for estimating skeletal kinematics. However, applicability of these systems in assessing upper-limb kinematics remains unexplored in highly dynamic activities. This study aimed to assess kinematics of the upper limb estimated with a markerless motion capture system (2D video cameras along with commercially available pose estimation software Theia3D) compared to those measured with marker-based system during "in the field" boxing. A total of three elite boxers equipped with retroreflective markers were instructed to perform specific sequences of shadow boxing trials. Their movements were simultaneously recorded with 12 optoelectronic and 10 video cameras, providing synchronized data to be processed further for comparison. Comparative assessment showed higher differences in 3D joint center positions at the elbow (more than 3 cm) compared to the shoulder and wrist (<2.5 cm). In the case of joint angles, relatively weaker agreement was observed along internal/external rotation. The shoulder joint revealed better performance across all the joints. Segment velocities displayed good-to-excellent agreement across all the segments. Overall, segment velocities exhibited better performance compared to joint angles. The findings indicate that, given the practicality of markerless motion capture system, it can be a promising alternative to analyze sports-performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.