Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35958565›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Characterization of monoclonal antibodies that specifically differentiate field isolates from vaccine strains of classical swine fever virus.

Shijiang Mi, Lihua Wang, Hongwei Li, Fei Bao, Rachel Madera, Xiju Shi, Liying Zhang, Yingying Mao, Renhe Yan, Xianzhu Xia and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Strategies of Classical Swine Fever Immune Evasion.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Shijiang MiState Key Laboratory for Zoonotic Diseases, Key Laboratory for Zoonoses Research of the Ministry of Education, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Lihua WangDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.
Hongwei LiSchool of Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Fei BaoChangchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun, China.
Rachel MaderaDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.
Xiju ShiInstitute of Animal Qurantine Reserach, Science and Technology Research Center of China Customs, Beijing, China.
Liying ZhangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Yingying MaoSchool of Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Renhe YanDepartment of Research & Development, Guangzhou Bioneeds Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Guangzhou, China.
Xianzhu XiaState Key Laboratory for Zoonotic Diseases, Key Laboratory for Zoonoses Research of the Ministry of Education, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Wenjie GongState Key Laboratory for Zoonotic Diseases, Key Laboratory for Zoonoses Research of the Ministry of Education, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Jishu ShiDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.
Changchun TuState Key Laboratory for Zoonotic Diseases, Key Laboratory for Zoonoses Research of the Ministry of Education, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Jilin University · CNKansas State University · USChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNSouthern Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classical swine fever virus (CSFV) is a major animal pathogen threatening the global pork industry. To date, numerous anti-CSFV monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and their recognizing epitopes have been reported. However, few mAbs were systematically characterized for the capacity to differentiate field CSFV isolates from CSF vaccine strains, and the molecular basis associated with antigenic differences between vaccines and field isolates is still largely unknown. In the present study, recombinant CSFV structural glycoproteins E2 of both virulent and vaccine strains and E

Indexed as

Classical Swine FeverClassical Swine Fever VirusViral VaccinesAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, ViralEpitopesGlycoproteinsMiceSwineAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, ViralEpitopesGlycoproteinsViral VaccinescharacterizationCSFVdifferentiating mAbE2epitopeErns

Identifiers

PMID35958565
PMCPMC9361847
OpenAlexW4285798921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.