Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35958522›Full record

ReviewEClinicalMedicine2022

Global newborn health research priorities identified in 2014: A review to evaluate the uptake.

Shuchita Gupta, Suman Pn Rao, Sachiyo Yoshida, Rajiv Bahl

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shuchita GuptaDepartment of Maternal, Child, Adolescent Health and Ageing (MCA), World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, CH-1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Suman Pn RaoDepartment of Maternal, Child, Adolescent Health and Ageing (MCA), World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, CH-1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Sachiyo YoshidaDepartment of Maternal, Child, Adolescent Health and Ageing (MCA), World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, CH-1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Rajiv BahlDepartment of Maternal, Child, Adolescent Health and Ageing (MCA), World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, CH-1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
World Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In 2014, World Health Organization published global research priorities for newborn health till 2025. We conducted this review to summarize completed or ongoing research on the twenty priorities. Methods: We conducted searches for twenty questions on MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, clinical trial registries, and funder websites between July 2014 and May 2022. Studies addressing research questions using adequate design were included. Adequacy of uptake of a priority was assessed based on predefined criteria. Findings: The uptake of research priorities was high for 8 (40%), moderate for 11 (55%), and one priority, effectiveness of training community health workers (CHWs) to treat neonatal sepsis at home remains unaddressed. Priorities with moderate uptake include effectiveness of simplified neonatal resuscitation programme, simple clinical algorithms for CHWs to neonatal infection, CHWs training in basic neonatal resuscitation, community-initiated kangaroo mother care, perinatal audits, and novel tocolytic agents, scaling-up chlorhexidine cord application, stable surfactant with simpler administration, accurate, affordable methods to diagnose fetal distress, strategies for prevention and treatment of intrauterine growth retardation, and causal pathways for antenatal stillbirths. Interpretation: Adequate research was undertaken on pressing global concerns in newborn health. Funders and researchers should reflect on and address less researched areas Funding: None.

Identifiers

PMID35958522
PMCPMC9358417
OpenAlexW4289636272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.