ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2022
Diagnostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for myocardial fibrosis in patients with heart failure and its predictive value for prognosis.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Myocardial Fibrosis: Assessment, Quantification, Prognostic Signification, and Anti-Fibrosis Targets: A State-of-the-Art Review.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the diagnostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) for myocardial fibrosis (MF) in patients with heart failure (HF) and its predictive value for prognosis.
methodsA total of 180 patients with heart failure who were hospitalized in the Cardiology Department of The First People's Hospital of Shangqiu City from September 2019 to May 2021 were selected and assigned to Group B (n=80) given levosimendan and Group A (n=100) given levosimendan combined with ivabradine hydrochloride. The cardiac function indicators (left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) were measured by nuclear magnetic resonance (MRI). Myocardial fibrosis (MF)-related indicators (pyridinoline cross-linked carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP), N-terminal propeptide of procollagen type III (PIIINP), connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), and hyaluronic acid (HA), inflammatory factors (Hs-CRP and IL-8) were measured using ELISA. Quality of life (QoL) and physical recovery (6-min walking test (6MWT), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), and Barthel index) of the two groups were compared. The late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was used to analyze the occurrence of MF in patients. The patients were further divided into the LGE (+) group (cases) and LGE (-) group (cases). The changes of cardiac function indicators before treatment were analyzed, and their predictive value was analyzed.
resultsCompared with Group B, Group A showed a lower incidence of complications, and presented a higher LVEF level and lower levels of LVESV, LVESD, ICTP, PIIINP, CTGF, HA, LN, and inflammatory factors. The area under the curves of LVESV, LVESD, and LVEF in predicting MF were all >0.7.
conclusionLevosimendan combined with ivabradine hydrochloride can effectively alleviate MF in patients with MF, and CMRI has a good predictive value for MF in such patients, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35958487PMC9360878W4291675350What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.